Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ao North America Charitable Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.6M
Granted FY2019
60
Grants FY2019
25
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$5.7MEducation$4.4MReligion$701kArts & Culture$363kPhilanthropy$75kFood & Nutrition$75kRecreation & Sports$68kScience & Tech$33k
02FY2019 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $635k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.0M
$70,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$162,377
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$145,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$142,500
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$137,500
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$117,500
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$115,000
RECTOR & BOARD OF VISITORSUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$115,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$100,000
SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$97,350
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$92,500
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE$90,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON$82,460
VANCOUVER ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA SOCIETY$78,325
SUNNYBROOK ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES$70,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER PROGRAM$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($9.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($1.5M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $116k → 16%MAYO DEPT OF ORTHOPEDIC: $120k → 9%ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL: $143k → 11%SFGH FOUNDATION: $105k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $135k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $115k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $82k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $118k → 21%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $85k → 12%ERLANGER HEALTH SYSTEMS: $70k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $70k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $75k → 8%METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $70k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $105k → 9%WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $75k → 19%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER DEPT OF NEUROSURGERY: $75k → 14%RECTOR & BOARD OF VISITORSUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $115k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL INSTITUTE: $75k → 19%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $70k → 16%MAYO DEPT OF ORTHOPEDIC: $75k → 9%ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK MEDICAL EDUCATION CONSORTIUM: $85k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $74k → 22%SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $97k → 10%UC REGENTS: $85k → 12%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER PROGRAM: $73k → 14%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $145k → 17%ST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION INC: $78k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $105k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $75k → 8%THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION: $70k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $78k → 9%WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $75k → 19%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER DEPT OF NEUROSURGERY: $75k → 14%RECTOR & BOARD OF VISITORSUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $75k → 8%MAYO DEPT OF ORTHOPEDIC: $70k → 9%SFGH FOUNDATION: $78k → 10%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $120k → 17%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROJECT: $74k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $75k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $73k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $75k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $90k → 19%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $72k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $75k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $75k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $75k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $73k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($1.5M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$1.5M · 26 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.7M · 50 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +78% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2019, 14 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
19

Total granted

$8.7M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+78%

Still filing today

24%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $367k · revenue +76%
  • TG
    TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $295k · revenue +651%
  • UO
    University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $220k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $180k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2018 · $153k
  • AG
    ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $143k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Congress Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
21/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $430,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $422,500 · OtherTHE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $363,407 · Other+69 more: $7,593,939 · Other+69 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $367,251 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIV…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $305,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF S…University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc: $220,000 · EducationUniversity of M…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $182,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF R…Yale University: $152,411 · EducationYale UniversityTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $111,186 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSO…Vanderbilt University: $70,221 · Education+7 more: $184,500 · Education+7 moreTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $295,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $207,500 · HealthST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $97,350 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center: $70,000 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthNorthwestern University: $67,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$8,809,846Education$1,593,069Health$879,850Recreation & Sports$67,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $367,251 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $305,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $295,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc: $220,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $207,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $182,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $152,411 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $111,186 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $97,350 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVanderbilt University: $70,221 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $67,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $32,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University: $32,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESS MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ao North America IncPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ao North America Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ao North America Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ao North America Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ao North America Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ao North America Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ao North America’s filings →

More from the funding graph