Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anya & Aarav Bhojwani Foundation In

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$74kHealth$61kHuman Services$42kYouth Development$27kCommunity Improvement$22kCivil Rights$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$868k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRY$10,000
RICE UNIVERSITY$5,000
HOUSTON SPCA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$3,000
EASTER SEALS$3,000
PRATHAM$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$3,000
AWTY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$2,650
OVARCOME$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SEARCH HOMELESS SERVICES$1,000
PROJECT BEAUTY SHARE$1,000
FRIENDS OF BELLAIRE LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIRLS WHO CODE: $1k → 17%PROJECT BEAUTY SHARE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$246k · 20 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$246k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+17%

Still filing today

35%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    3× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • KF
    KNOWAUTISM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $13k · revenue +74%
  • B
    BakerRipley
    3× · 2018–2020 · $13k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • MB
    MAGIC BUS USA
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +17%
  • AI
    AVANCE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k
  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
3
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
4
Texas Heart Institute

The mission of Texas Heart Institute (THI) is to reduce the devastating toll of cardiovascular disease through innovative and progressive programs in research, education, and improved patient care.

Health
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Room to Read

Room to read envisions a world free from illiteracy and gender inequality, where all children have room to read, learn and grow.

Education
7
Khan Academy Inc

A free world-class education for anyone, anywhere.

Education
8
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
9
Readworksinc

Readworks is an education-technology non-profit focused on improving reading comprehension that, through its digital platform, provides research-based content, curricular supports, and other features that integrate with core english…

Education
10
Kiss Institute for Practical Robotics

Our mission is to improve the public's understanding of science, technology, engineering, and math; develop the skills, character, and aspirations of students; and contribute to the enrichment of our school systems, communities, and the…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Bellaire Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRY: $33,997 · OtherCRYEASTER SEALS: $22,000 · OtherEASTER SEALSIndividual grant recipient: $20,916 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF RICE JONES SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RICE JONES SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $14,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRATHAM: $10,000 · OtherPRATHAMIndividual grant recipient: $7,156 · Other+17 more: $24,652 · Other+17 moreDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH TEXAS: $23,000 · HealthDOWN SYNDROME AS…KNOWAUTISM FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthKNOWAUTISM FOUND…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $3,000 · HealthThe Susan G Kome…+1 more: $554 · HealthWilliam Marsh Rice University: $20,000 · EducationWilliam Marsh…FRIENDS OF THE BELLAIRE LIBRARY: $6,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF TH…TEACH A CLASS: $5,400 · EducationTEACH A CLASSBakerRipley: $13,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT BEAUTY SHARE: $1,000 · Human ServicesPRATHAM USA: $5,575 · PhilanthropyHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 · AnimalsMAGIC BUS USA: $2,500 · International
Other$176,321Health$39,554Education$31,400Human Services$15,000Philanthropy$5,575Animals$3,000International$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH TEXAS: $23,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKNOWAUTISM FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBakerRipley: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BELLAIRE LIBRARY: $6,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $5,575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership For The Advancement And Immersion Of Refugees: $4,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Awty International School: $2,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGIC BUS USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREVOLUTION ROBOTICS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT BEAUTY SHARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $554 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds KNOWAUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BakerRipley ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BELLAIRE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds TEACH A CLASS ↗
  • Who funds Partnership For The Advancement And Immersion Of Refugees ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Awty International School ↗
  • Who funds MAGIC BUS USA ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds REVOLUTION ROBOTICS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BEAUTY SHARE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anya & Aarav Bhojwani Foundation In funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anya & Aarav Bhojwani Foundation In. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anya & Aarav Bhojwani Foundation In’s filings →

    More from the funding graph