· Private foundation
Anup & Parul Sud Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| McLaren Bay Medical Foundation | $10,000 |
| Genesee County Free Medical Clinic | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Flint Institute of Music | $1,000 |
| Chinmaya Mission Flint | $1,000 |
| Community Foundation of Greater Flint | $500 |
| Great Lakes Bay Health Center | $500 |
| Martus Luna Memorial Association | $500 |
| Whaley Children's Center | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC6× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +24%
- MFMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2023 · $6k · revenue +6%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2022–2023 · $3k
Funded once
- VIVALLEY INDIAN SENIORS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $2k
- VHVISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INCone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
- SHSAMARITANS HEALING HANDS INCone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
To receive and administer funds to support the mission of mclaren northern michigan and support programs that enhance the well-being of the community.
Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.
We create opportunities to inspire generosity and connect with our community.
Provision of health care services such as visiting nurse services, hospice services and home medical sales/services.
Creating healthy communities - together
To help mclaren thumb region obtain financial resources to provide excellence in patient care and services.
Mclaren oakland provides primary and specialty health care services guided by the values of integrity, excellence, diversity, and intelligence. we aspire to enhance the quality of life and health status of the people we serve.
Improve the health of genesee county residents. improve the quality and cost effectiveness of the health care system in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclaren Flint Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritans Healing Hands Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITANS HEALING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Flint Institute of Music ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT ↗
- Who funds Whaley Children's Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nartel Family Foundation · Anna Paulina Foundation · Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable Trust · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anup & Parul Sud Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anup & Parul Sud Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Anup & Parul Sud Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.