Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anthony J Galvin Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$219kEducation$201kRecreation & Sports$80kAnimals$60kHuman Services$40kYouth Development$13kPhilanthropy$11kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$15,000
CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION$15,000
SOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC$13,000
JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION$5,500
DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC$5,000
BLUE CLAWS CHARITIES INC$2,650
CAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC$2,500
DAN MARINO FOUNDATION$1,000
BRITTANY AMES SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%PARENTS WITH A PLAN: $1k → 4%BLUE CLAWS CHARITIES INC: $3k → 11%WOMEN IN NEED: $1k → 17%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%WOMEN IN NEED: $1k → 17%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $2k → 17%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $2k → 17%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $9k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$615k · 13 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$615k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-11%

Still filing today

77%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +30%
  • DC
    DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +83%
  • CF
    CAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • DC
    DAVID CONE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -419%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -11%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
3
Cancer Research Fund of the Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Foundation

To accelerate breakthroughs by providing today's best young scientists with funding to pursue innovative cancer research. the foundation's goals are to identify and fund the best and brightest early-career scientists in cancer research;…

Health
4
The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

Health
5
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
6
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
7
The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research (Us) Ltd

Partner with scientists to accelerate research that will transform the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer through ground breaking science carried out by individual investigators, multidisciplinary teams, and early stage…

Health
8
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
9
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
10
New York Yankees Foundation Inc

Providing assistance in the forms of gifts, contributions, grants, donations, scholarships and other financial assistance to support for profit and not-for-profit organizations located in the bronx, new york, the new york metropolitan…

—
11
Florida Atlantic University Foundation Inc

The mission of the florida atlantic university foundation inc. is to encourage, promote, and provide funds and other resources for the benefit of florida atlantic university (a part of the florida state university system) in furtherance of…

Education
12
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Claws Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INCROWAN FOUNDATION: $73,000 · OtherROWAN FOUNDATIONMIAMI DOLPHIN FOUNDATION: $59,500 · OtherMIAMI DOLPHIN FOUNDATION+2 more: $6,000 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $123,050 · EducationROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUND…THE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 · Human ServicesTHE DAN MARINO …JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesJASON TAYLOR FO…WOMEN IN NEED INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED I…+2 more: $3,650 · Human ServicesSOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTH FLORIDA…CAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $12,300 · Youth DevelopmentCAREY FAMILY …DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $45,000 · HealthDOLPHINS C…HERE'S HELP INC: $10,500 · HealthHERE'S HEL…+1 more: $1,500 · HealthDAVID CONE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$278,500Education$123,050Human Services$86,650Youth Development$74,300Health$57,000Philanthropy$11,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $140,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $123,050 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $12,300 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetHERE'S HELP INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HERE'S HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID CONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE CLAWS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN ↗
  • Who funds LENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS WITH A PLAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Florida Sports Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Florida Sports Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anthony J Galvin Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anthony J Galvin Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Here's Help Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anthony J Galvin Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Anthony J Galvin Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anthony J Galvin’s filings →

More from the funding graph