Skip to content
Anngar Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anngar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MEnvironment$1.1MHealth$430kEducation$270kArts & Culture$256kPhilanthropy$136kHuman Services$90kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PINE SCHOOL$100,000
HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST$28,500
BARNSTABLE CLEAN WATER COALITION$25,000
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$20,000
THE VERB KIND INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOBE SOUND CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 10%HOBE SOUND EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $20k → 10%HOBE SOUND CHILD CARE CENTER: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 11 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+119%

Still filing today

91%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $850k · revenue +25%
  • TB
    THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $245k · revenue +20%
  • MC
    MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $235k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHURCH MOVEMENT OF SPIRITUAL
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +119%
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE MOVEMENT OF SPIRITUAL
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
2
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
3
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
4
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
5
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
6
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
7
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
8
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
9
Little Keswick Education Corporation

Keswick school was founded in 1963 as little keswick school by bob and libby wilson, two local public school teachers who started the school on their 25 acre farm (little keswick farm) outside of charlottesville, va. initially a summer…

Education
10
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
11
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
12
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH MOVEMENT OF SPIRITUAL: $1,000,000 · OtherCHURCH MOVEMENT OF SPIRITUALCHURCH OF THE MOVEMENT OF SPIRITUAL: $200,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE MOVEMENT OF SPIRITUALST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $110,000 · OtherST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH+2 more: $41,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $850,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT C…THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC: $245,000 · EnvironmentTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INCTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $250,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medi…HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $135,500 · PhilanthropyHOBE SOUND C…TEAM IMPACT INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTEAM IMPACT …MIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $235,000 · Arts & CultureThe Pine School Inc: $230,000 · EducationTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $105,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $30,000 · HealthCOOL CARS FOR KIDS INC: $20,000 · HealthHOBE SOUND CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesEXCHANGE CLUB DICK WEBBER CENTER: $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE VERB KIND INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,351,000Environment$1,145,000Philanthropy$410,500Arts & Culture$235,000Education$230,000Health$155,000Human Services$60,000Crime & Legal$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $850,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC: $245,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $235,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Pine School Inc: $230,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $135,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $105,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetHOBE SOUND CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB DICK WEBBER CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOOL CARS FOR KIDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE VERB KIND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anngar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anngar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Three Bays Preservation Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Pine School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anngar’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home