Skip to content
Anne L Sislik Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Anne L Sislik Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$435k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
FLORIDA SHERIFF'S YOUTH RANCHES INC$100,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$100,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$35,000
JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES$35,000
DOGS INC SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS$10,000
HPH STURGILL HOSPICE HOSPITAL$10,000
FRIENDS WHO CARE LLC$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
MERCY SHIPS$10,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY FLORIDA$10,000
LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $5k → 12%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$385k · 8 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$385k
$10k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyReligionInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue +18%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANINE COMPANIONS: $40,000 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONSHPH STURGILL HOSPICE HOSPITAL: $12,500 · OtherHPH STURGILL HOSPICE HOSPITALFRIENDS WHO CARE INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · OtherNORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherDOGS INC SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $10,000 · OtherFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $130,000 · Youth DevelopmentFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranch…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $130,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOW…JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC: $37,500 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionMercy Ships International: $12,500 · InternationalLighthouse for the Visually Impaired and Blind Inc: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$192,500Youth Development$130,000Education$130,000Philanthropy$37,500Religion$15,000International$12,500Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $130,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC: $37,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLighthouse for the Visually Impaired and Blind Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anne L Sislik Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anne L Sislik Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Jericho Road Ministries Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anne L Sislik’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home