Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Anne Arundel Workforce Development Corporation

ANNE ARUNDEL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (aawdc) is a nonprofit organization that enhances the economic vitality of anne arundel county by developing and implementing workforce solutions.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of ANNE ARUNDEL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOWARD COUNTY AUTISM SOCIETY (HCAS)$50,000
PROJECTNOW LLC$27,940
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 15% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Department of Labor Licensing & Regulation: $17k → 16%PROJECTNOW LLC: $36k → 7%KRA: $685k → 6%ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21k → 6%SUSQUEHANNA WORKFORCE NETWORK INC: $102k → 7%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND: $178k → 8%Prince Georges County: $6k → 11%SEEDCO: $83k → 19%PROJECTNOW LLC: $35k → 7%KRA: $282k → 6%ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $19k → 6%SUSQUEHANNA WORKFORCE NETWORK: $32k → 7%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MD: $153k → 8%PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY: $200k → 11%Job Opportunities Tast Force: $27k → 19%PROJECTNOW LLC: $32k → 7%KRA: $56k → 6%OIC OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INC: $100k → 6%SUSQUEHANNA WORKFORCE NETWORK INC: $3k → 7%TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND: $8k → 8%PROJECTNOW LLC: $28k → 7%HOWARD COUNTY AUTISM SOCIETY (HCAS): $50k → 6%ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $51k → 6%HOWARD COUNTY AUTISM SOCIETY (HCAS): $50k → 6%ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 8 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -21% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$3.0M
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-21%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationEmploymentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    US Chamber of Commerce Foundation
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +38%
  • TC
    TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND
    4× · 2017–2020 · $339k · revenue +112%
  • SW
    SUSQUEHANNA WORKFORCE NETWORK INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $138k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • OO
    OIC OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -1% · 45% of their budget
  • SE
    Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $83k · revenue -21%
  • AA
    ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $51k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anne Arundel Workforce Development Corporation

Anne arundel workforce development corporation (aawdc) is a nonprofit organization that enhances the economic vitality of anne arundel county by developing and implementing workforce solutions. we build and maintain a pipeline of skilled…

Employment
2
WorkSource Montgomery Inc

Assist the Montgomery County WIB, in expanding the Public Workforce Development System in the county, through serving and connecting job seekers and businesses.

Community Improvement
3
Eastern Connecticut Workforce Investment Board Inc

EWIB efficiently coordinates employment-related services in concert with a multitude of state and local agencies at benefit to both businesses and job-seekers. These services offer new opportunities and/or skills to the regional workforce,…

Employment
4
New Jersey Council of County Colleges

To perform statewide coordinating functions for New Jerseys community colleges and develop community-college led partnerships and solutions to expand educational and economic opportunity.

5
Maryland Works Inc

To promote economic and workforce development strategies that assure full inclusion of individuals with disabilities and other barriers to employment.

Employment
6
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
7
Chatham County Economic Development Corporation

Building on the county's strategic location between the triad and triangle, edc is positioning chatham as the preferred location for emerging growth companies. the policy-driven approach focuses on targeted attraction, retention, and…

Community Improvement
8
Virginia Maryland and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives

Trade association for electric cooperatives

9
Workforce Development Council Snohomish County

Workforce snohomish invests government and private funding to continuously increase the global competitiveness and prosperity of our businesses and workforce, to fill current and emerging jobs, and to provide full employment. our…

Education
10
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
11
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

12
Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council

Swwdc's mission is to prepare and promote a skilled and adaptive workforce for a thriving economy in southwest washington. swwdc and its community partners provide job search assistance, education and training to individuals and assist…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland and the most unlike its peers is Oic of Anne Arundel County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KRA CORPORATION — $1,023,180 · OtherKRA CORPORATIONPROJECTNOW LLC — $130,139 · OtherPROJECTNOW LLCOIC OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INC — $100,000 · OtherOIC OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INCANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY — $50,905 · Other+2 more — $26,420 · OtherUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $1,059,027 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce FoundationANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $39,148 · EducationTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND — $338,949 · Community ImprovementTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FO…PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $206,064 · Community ImprovementPRINCE GEORGE'S COUNT…Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation — $83,150 · Community ImprovementStructured Employment…SUSQUEHANNA WORKFORCE NETWORK INC — $137,596 · EmploymentJOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC — $27,268 · EmploymentAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC — $100,000 · Health
Other$1,330,644Education$1,098,175Community Improvement$628,163Employment$164,864Health$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $1,059,027 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND — $338,949 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetPRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $206,064 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA WORKFORCE NETWORK INC — $137,596 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC — $100,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetOIC OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetStructured Employment Economic Development Corporation — $83,150 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $39,148 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC — $27,268 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anne Arundel Workforce Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Autism Society of Maryland Inc67% of income from government
  • Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland6% of income from government
  • Susquehanna Workforce Network Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph