Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $175k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
3
’18
5
’19
4
’20
5
’21
13
’22
9
’23
11
’24
10
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$591kPhilanthropy$359kEducation$207kArts & Culture$113kRecreation & Sports$102kHuman Services$100kAnimals$90kHousing & Shelter$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NRV$40,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION$10,000
CHARLESTON MOVES$10,000
SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM$10,000
SECOND PRESBYTERIAN PRESCHOOL & KINDERGARTEN$5,000
WEST VIRGINIA SCENIC TRAILS ASSOCIATION$5,000
HEART OF THE HIGHLANDS TRAIL SYSTEM$5,000
KANAWHA VALLEY TRAIL ALLIANCE$5,000
NEIGHBORS TOGETHER$5,000
WESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN PRESCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEIGHBORS TOGETHER: $5k → 12%NEIGHBORS TOGETHER: $5k → 12%NEIGHBORS TOGETHER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 71%.

Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 17 repeat orgs$853k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
18

Total granted

$545k
$803k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-5%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    South Carolina Aquarium
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +64%
  • TW
    THE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $56k · revenue +110%
  • CM
    Charleston Moves
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF WV
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • LF
    LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -74%
  • CS
    CAWV SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia Land Stewardship Corporation

To promote sustainable economic development by facilitating reuse of commercial, industrial, and mining sites and providing long-term management of key risks from legacy environmental concerns.

Community Improvement
2
Virginia Capital Trail Foundation

The virginia capital trail foundation exists to protect, promote, and enhance the virginia capital trail and engage communities around it.

Recreation & Sports
3
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
4
The Land Trust of Virginia Inc

To operate as ltv for the purpose of promoting the preservation, protection and balanced use of natural, scenic, and historic resources in the commonwealth of virginia through conservation easements and ownership.

Environment
5
James River Association

The mission of the james river association is to be guardian of the james river. we provide a voice for the river and take action to promote conservation and responsible stewardship of its natural resources.

Environment
6
West Virginia Nonprofit Association Inc

The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…

Public Benefit
7
Virginia Environmental Endowment

The endowment's mission is to improve the quality of the environment by using its capital, expertise, and resources to fund projects and programs that encourage all sectors to work together to prevent pollution, improve water quality,…

Environment
8
Virginia Foundation for Agriculture Innovation and Rural Sustainability

To assist rural virginians in developing and advancing their agricultural, economic and social interests to enhance their quality of life.

Environment
9
West Virginia Rivers Coalition Inc

To promote safe and healthy waters for all in west virginia, primarily through water policy advocacy. the organization provides public education and informational resources.

Environment
10
West Virginia Community Action Partnersh

West virginia community action partnership is an alliance of community action agencies that supports and strengthens our members, advocates for low-income and families and promotes partnerships.

Community Improvement
11
Wild Virginia Incorporated

Protecting and connecting virginia's wild places.

Environment
12
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charleston Moves. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF WV: $500,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF WVHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVE: $70,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVENEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $52,500 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INCCAWV SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherTHE CLAY CENTER: $50,000 · OtherCHARLESTON MOVES: $35,000 · Other+18 more: $164,200 · Other+18 moreTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $295,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FO…LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA…YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $51,000 · PhilanthropyYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDA…+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropySouth Carolina Aquarium: $60,000 · AnimalsCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · AnimalsTHE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC: $56,000 · EnvironmentNEW RIVER LAND TRUST: $15,000 · EnvironmentCharleston Moves: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsVALLEY INTERFAITH CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesNeighbors Together Inc: $12,500 · Human ServicesLOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF: $2,500 · Human ServicesWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationBACKPACK BUDDIES SEABROOK ISLAND: $2,500 · Education
Other$971,700Philanthropy$448,500Animals$90,000Environment$71,000Recreation & Sports$55,000Human Services$50,000Arts & Culture$30,000Education$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $295,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVE: $70,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetSouth Carolina Aquarium: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC: $56,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCharleston Moves: $55,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $52,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY INTERFAITH CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $35,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANAWHA STATE FOREST FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW RIVER LAND TRUST: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA SCENIC TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetNeighbors Together Inc: $12,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBACKPACK BUDDIES SEABROOK ISLAND: $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVE ↗
  • Who funds South Carolina Aquarium ↗
  • Who funds THE WEST VIRGINIA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Charleston Moves ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY INTERFAITH CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KANAWHA STATE FOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA SCENIC TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Neighbors Together Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds BACKPACK BUDDIES SEABROOK ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The West Virginia Humanities Council Inc · Tgkvf Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · The Strong-Treister Family Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ann C and Robert O Orders Jr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph