Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anita a Ray Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$413kCrime & Legal$125kFood & Nutrition$80kHousing & Shelter$72kInternational$44kArts & Culture$30kPublic Benefit$14kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER$10,000
THE STEWPOT$10,000
THE BRIDGE$10,000
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
THE FAMILY PLACE$10,000
WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER$9,000
SALVATION ARMY OF TYLER$8,000
SALVATION ARMY DFW METROPLEX$8,000
MERCY SHIPS$7,000
EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER$7,000
GREATER DALLAS YOUTH ORCHESTRA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $373k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $6k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 12%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $9k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $7k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $7k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $7k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $11k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $11k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $10k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $8k → 14%THE BRIDGE: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$876k · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$876k
$8k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Family Place
    9× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +6%
  • WC
    WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +174%
  • DC
    DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF TYLER
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
2
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Dallas Physician Medical Services for Children Inc

Provide dental, general pediatric, and pediatric sub-specialty services, including, but not limited to emergency department coverage, inpatient coverage, orthopedic surgery, and craniofacial orthodontics regardless of payor source or…

Health
5
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
6
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
7
Dallas Contemporary

Dallas contemporary presents art in a forum that cultivates artists, ignites learning and inspires the community. dallas contemporary is a non-collecting art museum presenting new and challenging ideas from regional, national and…

Arts & Culture
8
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
9
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
10
Dispute Resolution Center

Dispute resolution center provides accessible high-quality dispute resolution services such as mediation, arbitration and training for all people in the travis county area.

—
11
Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc

Children's advocacy centers of texas, inc. (cactx) is the statewide organization for its 70 children's advocacy centers (cac's) across texas. cactx leads efforts, in partnership with investigatory and prosecution agencies, to pursue…

Crime & Legal
12
Children's Advocacy Center of the South Plains

To bring together community resources to speed the healing of child victims of abuse and trauma.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge; the most unlike its peers is Greater Dallas Youth Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Family Place: $91,722 · Human ServicesThe Family PlaceWESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INCDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $80,500 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERTHE BRIDGE: $64,313 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGEST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $57,306 · Human ServicesST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC: $51,000 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INCSALVATION ARMY DFW METROPLEX: $92,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY DFW METROPLEXTHE STEWPOT: $89,500 · OtherTHE STEWPOTGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $82,000 · OtherGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTERTHE SALVATION ARMY: $70,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMercy Ships International: $20,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE OF NORTH TEXAS: $14,000 · Other+3 more: $21,000 · Other+3 moreGreater Dallas Youth Orchestra Inc: $35,000 · Arts & CultureMercy Ships International: $31,000 · International
Human Services$429,841Other$388,500Arts & Culture$35,000International$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Family Place: $91,722 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $85,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $80,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $64,313 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $57,306 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC: $51,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Dallas Youth Orchestra Inc: $35,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetMercy Ships International: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $20,000 over 4y, 48% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Dallas Youth Orchestra Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anita a Ray Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anita a Ray Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anita a Ray’s filings →

    More from the funding graph