Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Angerman Friedman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$18kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$6kHuman Services$5kEducation$1kArts & Culture$775Membership Benefit$600Food & Nutrition$520Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$100
Median grant
1
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK$10,000
RODEF SHALOM CONGREGATION$550
THE BRANCH$500
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL$205
GLOBAL PEACE BUILDING FOUNDATION$100
PITTSBURGH ZOO AND AQUARIUM$100
FRIENDS OF THE MT LEBANON PUBLIC LIBRARY$100
ANIMAL FRIENDS$50
HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE PITTSBURGH$25
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $500 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $20 → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH (JCC): $20 → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ND
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MD
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$28k · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
35

Total granted

$28k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+8%

Still filing today

69%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JR
    JEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $900 · revenue +8%
  • JC
    JEWISH CEMETERY & BURIAL ASSOC OF GR PGH
    3× · 2021–2024 · $600 · revenue +139%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HEARING & DEAF SERVICES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $500 · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • BP
    BEVERLY'S PGH
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
  • OL
    OSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel Jewish University Center

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
Highlands Hospital

Highlands hospital is committed to providing health care to the community in a competent, nurturing and healing environment. our staff will provide support in times of crisis and furnish the resources necessary to promote a healthy…

Health
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
7
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
8
Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation

Phlf works within a 250-mile radius of pittsburgh, pennsylvania to: identify and save historically significant places; renew historic neighborhoods, towns, and urban areas; preserve historic farms and historically designated landscapes;…

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
10
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Residential Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allegany Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr13%9%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr15%30%35–55yr17%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%30%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr15%11%35–55yr17%40%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
9%
7,128/78,127

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK — $15,000 · OtherALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORKTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL — $2,859 · OtherTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAELRODEF SHALOM CONGREGATION — $2,786 · OtherRODEF SHALOM CONGREGATION+28 more — $3,926 · Other+28 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $5,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…+1 more — $25 · PhilanthropyBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION — $4,725 · Human ServicesBAPTIST HOMES F…BEVERLY'S PGH — $500 · Human ServicesBEVERLY'S PGH+3 more — $60 · Human ServicesLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $1,000 · HealthJEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC — $900 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $225 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 · Health+2 more — $70 · HealthOSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE AT CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY — $500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $100 · EducationHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH — $25 · Education+1 more — $18 · EducationPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $125 · Arts & CultureMCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT — $100 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH JEWISH PUBLICATION & EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $100 · Arts & CultureDENSHO — $100 · Arts & CultureGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $270 · Food & Nutrition
Other$24,571Philanthropy$5,525Human Services$5,285Health$2,295Education$643Arts & Culture$425Food & Nutrition$270

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION — $4,725 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CEMETERY & BURIAL ASSOC OF GR PGH — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & DEAF SERVICES INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE AT CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUST HARVEST EDUCATION FUND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Mt Lebanon Public Library — $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENSHO — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGANY MUSEUM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE MOUNTAIN ANIMAL RESCUE — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVA — $45 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC — $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERSAD CENTER INC — $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA23.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · David S Shapira Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Giant Eagle Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Morris Charles M Tr Ua-Char · Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation · Catherine and Mark H Loevner Family Foundation · Eckert Seamans Charitable Foundation · Allegheny Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Angerman Friedman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Angerman Friedman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Angerman Friedman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph