· Public charity
Angel Society of Fallbrook
The purpose of the Angel Society of Fallbrook shall be to fund, support and enhance charitable projects and programs of community or social welfare, in but not limited to, the greater Fallbrook area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $132,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $269,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $137,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Fallbrook Union High School | $25,500 |
| Fallbrook Elementary Schools | $18,000 |
| Fallbrook Land Conservancy | $11,500 |
| REINS | $11,000 |
| Fallbrook Senior Center Ntr | $10,000 |
| North Cty Boys & Girls Club | $10,000 |
| Foundation for Senior Care | $9,700 |
| Rotary Club Fallbrook Village | $8,750 |
| Union Station Homeless Servic | $7,500 |
| Fallbrook Trails Council | $7,500 |
| Fallbrook Animal Sanctuary | $7,000 |
| Fallbrook Music Society | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FLFALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCY7× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +76%
- FFFALLBROOK FOOD PANTRY4× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue ×15
- SFSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC3× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- FMFALLBROOK MUSIC SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +32%
- FVFALLBROOK VILLAGE ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +105%
- FBFALLBROOK BAND BOOSTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide shelter for the homeless of Falls Church.
The mission of this corporation is to operate, maintain, and improve recreational and sports facilities and fields owned by California public agencies and non-profit organizations and to support and develop amateur atheletic organizations…
To provide housing for the moderate income elderly persons.
Promote the study and appreciation of mineralogy, paleontology and related earth sciences through a museum which is open to the public in fallbrook california
We try to make sure the elderly, disabled and all children are helped in our community when needed.
We provide quality early childhood education and day care for children ages one to five years. We strive to promote each childs intellectual, emotional, social, and physical development in preparation for kindergarten.
Volunteer fire and ambulance
The purpose of this organization shall be charitable, scientific, literary and educational, with particular emphasis upon bringing together those persons interested in the history of the Fallbrook area and the preservation of its artifacts.
The sole purpose of this Corporation shall be the enrichment and enhancement of the Fallbrook branch of the San Diego County Library and to assist the function of this cultural facility in any manner deemed beneficial by this Corporation.
FRC is a nonprofit recreation council that oversees, organizes and provides recreational activities in the Fallston area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fallbrook Food Pantry and the most unlike its peers is Union Station Homeless Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FALLBROOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Fallbrook Senior Citizens Service Club ↗
- Who funds Fallbrook Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK TRAILS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CHARLES E SWISHER POST 1924 ↗
- Who funds Riding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FALLBROOK BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE FALLBROOK COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Legacy Endowment the Community Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Betterworld Trust · Henry L Guenther Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Angel Society of Fallbrook funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.