Skip to content
Angel Charity for Children Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Angel Charity for Children Inc

To improve the quality of life for the children in our community.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.2MHuman Services$1.7MEducation$1.3MArts & Culture$1.0MFood & Nutrition$511kYouth Development$373kAnimals$265kRecreation & Sports$102kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $260k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$65,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Museum Tucson$1,000,000
Arizona's Children Association$75,000
Junior League of Tucson$67,600
Tucson Medical Center Foundation$65,000
Tucson Community Tennis Program$52,000
Fox Tucson Theatre Foundation$32,500
Wheel Fun$21,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Arizona's Children Association: $75k → 11%Gabriels Angels: $35k → 11%More Than a Bed: $50k → 15%GAP Ministries: $40k → 15%Tucson Refugee Ministry: $22k → 15%Jewish Family and Childrens Services (JFCS): $20k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $768k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $75k → 15%Erik Hite Foundation: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
37

Total granted

$1.6M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    2× · 2019–2020 · $461k · revenue +20%
  • TR
    TUCSON REFUGEE MINISTRY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $97k · revenue +27%
  • BT
    Boys to Men Tucson Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $88k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • B-
    Banner -University Medical Group
    one grant, 2024 · $800k · revenue 0%
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWNgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $768k · revenue +78%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $700k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Arizona Theatre Company

ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.

Arts & Culture
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
5
Phoenix Children's Hospital

To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.

Health
6
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
7
Southern Az Childrens Advocacy Ctr Inc

The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…

Crime & Legal
8
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc

Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.

Public Benefit
9
Tucson Community School Inc

Tucson community school's mission is to provide a creative learning experience emphasizing outdoor play and family participation in a safe environment which respects each child's uniqueness and individual learning style.

Education
10
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
11
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
12
The Dons of Arizona
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is More Than a Bed; the most unlike its peers is Cascade Foundation of S Arizona Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
32/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Banner -University Medical Group: $800,000 · HealthBanner -University Medical Grou…CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: $700,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILI…NAMI of Southern Arizona: $388,000 · HealthNAMI of Southern ArizonaTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $115,300 · HealthBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $100,000 · Health+8 more: $252,753 · Health+8 moreYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $768,161 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWNINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $700,000 · Human ServicesINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR…TUCSON REFUGEE MINISTRY: $97,400 · Human ServicesVIVA PIMA: $75,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · Human Services+5 more: $154,768 · Human Services+5 moreIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL: $600,000 · EducationIMAGO DEI MIDDLE S…University of Arizona Foundation: $461,000 · EducationUniversity of Ariz…EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $148,150 · EducationEDUCATIONAL ENRICH…LITERACY CONNECTS: $50,000 · EducationMake Way For Books: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $54,124 · EducationTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTUCSON CHILDRE…+3 more: $78,073 · Arts & Culture+3 moreArizona Diaper Bank: $610,000 · ReligionTHERAPEUTIC RANCH FOR ANIMALS AND KIDS: $104,840 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $92,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys to Men Tucson Inc: $88,000 · Youth DevelopmentConquistadores Youth Golf Fund: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentWHEEL FUN: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentTUCSON SOCCER ACADEMY INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $265,000 · AnimalsAmphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc: $83,300 · OtherInterfaith Community Services: $71,000 · OtherSt John the Evangelist Catholic School: $49,704 · OtherYWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $25,000 · OtherJunior League of Tucson Inc: $67,600 · OtherTREASURES 4 EDUCATORS INC DBA TREASURES 4 TEACHERS OF TUCSON: $25,000 · OtherTUCSON COMMUNITY TENNIS PROGRAM: $52,000 · OtherCOURTNEY'S COURAGE: $40,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $60,000 · OtherEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · Other
Health$2,356,053Human Services$1,870,329Education$1,363,274Arts & Culture$1,078,073Religion$610,000Youth Development$355,840Animals$265,000Other$533,604

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $1,000,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetBanner -University Medical Group: $800,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $768,161 over 1y, 17% of budgetCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: $700,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $700,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetArizona Diaper Bank: $610,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL: $600,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $461,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNAMI of Southern Arizona: $388,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $265,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $148,150 over 1y, 19% of budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $115,300 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC RANCH FOR ANIMALS AND KIDS: $104,840 over 1y, 15% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $100,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTUCSON REFUGEE MINISTRY: $97,400 over 2y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $92,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBoys to Men Tucson Inc: $88,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetAmphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc: $83,300 over 2y, 12% of budgetVIVA PIMA: $75,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $71,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJunior League of Tucson Inc: $67,600 over 1y, 22% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $65,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $60,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTUCSON COMMUNITY TENNIS PROGRAM: $52,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMORE THAN A BED: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMake Way For Books: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $48,983 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNOURISH: $45,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetCOURTNEY'S COURAGE: $40,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetGAP MINISTRIES: $39,748 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEAD GUITAR: $35,573 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetConquistadores Youth Golf Fund: $30,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $28,824 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSaavi Services for the Blind: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTREASURES 4 EDUCATORS INC DBA TREASURES 4 TEACHERS OF TUCSON: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWHEEL FUN: $21,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $20,020 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCASCADE FOUNDATION OF S ARIZONA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCandlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern Arizona: $6,760 over 1y, 6.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Hs Lopez Family F…Arizona Community Fou…Connie Hillman Family…United Way of Tucson …Jewish Community Foun…Marshall FoundationSocial Venture Partne…Fred & Christine Arms…The Diane and Bruce H…Tucson Osteopathic Me…Del E Webb Foundation
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ84.4× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Marshall Foundation · Social Venture Partners Tucson · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation · Del E Webb Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angel Charity for Children Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angel Charity for Children Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Angel Charity for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home