Skip to content

· Private foundation

Andrews Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$155k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$917kHuman Services$71kHealth$14kReligion$11kHousing & Shelter$9kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $155k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OU FOUNDATION$155,200
YWCA OKC$10,000
THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%YWCA OKC: $10k → 16%YWCA OKC: $10k → 16%WARRIORS FOR FREEDOM: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$994k · 9 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
23

Total granted

$994k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+32%

Still filing today

33%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $865k · revenue -126%
  • YO
    YWCA OKLAHOMA CITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $45k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $39k

Funded once

  • WF
    White Fields Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • BF
    BELLER FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +106%
  • A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
3
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
4
Oklahoma Blood Institute

Oklahoma blood institute's (obi) mission is to be the donor-to-patient lifeline by providing our communities and medical partners security by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health
5
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
6
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
9
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.

Human Services
10
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
11
Angels Foster Family Network Okc Inc

The angels mission is to rescue abused, abandoned, and neglected young children, match them with a select group of foster parents, and ensure the maximum emotional, social, and intellectual development of each child.

Human Services
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Chance to Change Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beller Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $865,160 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCYWCA OKLAHOMA CITY: $45,000 · OtherYWCA OKLAHOMA …UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $38,930 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF …BRITTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherBRITTON CHRIST…Individual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherWhite Fields Inc: $6,500 · OtherA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $18,900 · Other+15 moreYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $20,000 · Human ServicesBELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesWARRIORS FOR FREEDOM: $1,000 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthBAY ISLAND IMPACT: $1,042 · HealthBROTHERS IN RECOVERY INC: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$865,160Other$132,330Human Services$30,000Health$8,042Youth Development$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $865,160 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWhite Fields Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHERS IN RECOVERY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWARRIORS FOR FREEDOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI ↗
  • Who funds White Fields Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY ISLAND IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS IN RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIORS FOR FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andrews Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andrews Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andrews Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph