Skip to content
Andrew Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Andrew Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$847k
Granted FY2025still arriving
160
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.2MYouth Development$591kArts & Culture$587kFood & Nutrition$554kHuman Services$289kHealth$228kReligion$218kRecreation & Sports$203kOther$0
02FY2025 · 160 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k136 grants · $269k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $338k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $241k
$1,500
Median grant
24
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
CHICAGO FOOD RESCUE$90,500
IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE$50,000
FOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO$31,000
COLLEGE OF WOOSTER$26,800
THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC$25,000
THE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC$25,000
ELITE YOUTH TOUR$25,000
SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA$25,000
DISCOVERY CHILDRENS MUSEUM$20,000
FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC$16,000
ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION$15,000
SOUTHWEST CHICAGO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$14,000
COLLEGE OF WOOSTER$12,300
DREAM DARE TO REVITALIZE EDUCATION THRU ARTS & MED$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $254k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $5k → 11%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 18%FLORIDA KEYS CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $1k → 13%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $1k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 8%SISTER SONG INC: $1k → 13%GIRLS WITH SOLE: $9k → 17%HANDS ON NEW ORLEANS: $6k → 23%CHILDREN 4 TOMORROW: $10k → 16%THE INN BETWEEN: $1k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 8%ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $5k → 10%CHILDREN 4 TOMORROW: $1k → 16%ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $1k → 10%CHILDREN 4 TOMORROW: $1k → 16%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $10k → 8%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $5k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $5k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PHOENIX ARIZONA: $1k → 11%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $5k → 10%HOPE FOR PRISONERS OM INC: $2k → 13%HARAMBEE INITIATIVE INC: $4k → 7%DIAPER BANK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $4k → 17%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $5k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $5k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $5k → 10%DIAPER BANK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $7k → 17%THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $3k → 7%HOPE FOR PRISONERS OM INC: $2k → 13%EAST VALLEY WOMENS LEAGUE INC: $5k → 11%EAST VALLEY WOMENS LEAGUE INC: $3k → 11%HOPE FOR PRISONERS OM INC: $2k → 13%EAST VALLEY WOMENS LEAGUE INC: $3k → 11%FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%PROJECT MARILYN: $5k → 13%PROJECT MARILYN: $2k → 13%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $2k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $19k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $10k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $5k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $5k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $5k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $4k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $3k → 14%NEW MOMS INC: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Andrew Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 32% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 25%.

Andrew Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 202 repeat orgs$516k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

202 repeat relationships: 93 still active in FY2025, 109 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

202
175

Total granted

$5.6M
$403k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+21%

Still filing today

77%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    READING IN MOTION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $667k · revenue +12%
  • THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +17%
  • ST
    SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $389k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • JH
    JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +107%
  • HT
    HOGARES TERESA TODA CARMELITAS DE SAN JOSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +52%
  • SF
    SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
7
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
8
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
9
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Moms Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jacobs Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

347 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 347 of the 423 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
72
Early backer (in before they grew)
341/347
Grantees still filing
228/347
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $449,750 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTERKNOX COLLEGE: $167,000 · EducationKNOX COLLEGEFirst Point Volleyball Foundation: $158,500 · EducationFirst Point Volleyball Fou…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $114,935 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY F…Southwest Chicago Christian School Association: $87,250 · EducationSouthwest Chicago Christia…LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $80,150 · EducationLAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WIS…ELITE YOUTH TOUR: $71,150 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $47,950 · Education+23 more: $246,303 · Education+23 moreTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $159,320 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLOR…PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA A CORP: $126,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA A CORPRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES WESTERN MICHIGAN: $108,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES W…IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 · OtherIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE I…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $87,850 · Other+102 more: $1,254,343 · Other+102 moreREADING IN MOTION: $667,000 · Arts & CultureREADING IN MOTIONDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $196,850 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S …GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $144,500 · Arts & CultureGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSE…INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $40,200 · Arts & Culture+13 more: $132,363 · Arts & Culture+13 more412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $300,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RES…Chicago Food Rescue Inc: $217,800 · Food & NutritionChicago Food…FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC: $58,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD RECOVER…HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 more: $49,759 · Food & Nutrition+8 moreSPREAD THE WORD NEVADA: $388,600 · Youth DevelopmentSPREAD THE…CAFE MOMENTUM: $70,500 · Youth DevelopmentCAFE MOMEN…THE BRIDGE TEEN CENTER NFP: $22,140 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $20,786 · Youth Development+7 more: $42,775 · Youth Development+7 moreARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $248,700 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,750 · PhilanthropyNEW MOMS INC: $66,450 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOGARES TERESA TODA CARMELITAS DE SAN JOSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesINWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN 4 TOMORROW: $12,000 · Human ServicesDIAPER BANK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $11,800 · Human ServicesEast Valley Women's League Inc: $10,875 · Human ServicesGirls With Sole: $9,000 · Human Services+11 more: $57,100 · Human Services
Education$1,422,988Other$1,835,513Arts & Culture$1,180,913Food & Nutrition$656,059Youth Development$544,801Philanthropy$257,450Human Services$245,225

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREADING IN MOTION: $667,000 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $449,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPREAD THE WORD NEVADA: $388,600 over 8y, 2.3% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $248,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Food Rescue Inc: $217,800 over 2y, 64% of budgetDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $196,850 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE: $167,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $159,320 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFirst Point Volleyball Foundation: $158,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $144,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $114,935 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES WESTERN MICHIGAN: $108,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetIMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $87,850 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSouthwest Chicago Christian School Association: $87,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $80,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetELITE YOUTH TOUR: $71,150 over 5y, 16% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM: $70,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $66,450 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC: $58,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $47,950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $41,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $40,200 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH THEATRE: $36,750 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP: $31,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE DESERT CHORALE: $30,100 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER: $27,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $23,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TEEN CENTER NFP: $22,140 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,786 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $20,365 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT NFP: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION: $18,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $18,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDANCE INSTITUTE OF WASHINGTON: $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Meadows School: $17,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $17,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Fe Concert Association dba Performance Santa Fe: $17,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $15,320 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTahoe Rim Trail Association: $14,750 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE: $13,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds READING IN MOTION ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds 412 FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Food Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds KNOX COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds First Point Volleyball Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds IMMOKALEE FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Chicago Christian School Association ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ↗
  • Who funds ELITE YOUTH TOUR ↗
  • Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE DESERT CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NV Energy Charitable …Lloyd a Fry FoundationNevada Community Foun…Wynn Resorts Foundati…Engelstad Family Foun…John D and Catherine …The Chicago Community…Polk Bros Foundation …Dr Scholl FoundationAfc Public FoundationImc Chicago Charitabl…Joseph & Bessie Feinb…
NV Energy Charitable FoundationNV31.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Engelstad Family Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Dr Scholl Foundation · Afc Public Foundation · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andrew Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andrew Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Farm Aid Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Osamequin Farm Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Mill City Grows Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Coalition for African Americans in the Performing Arts: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Dolphin Research Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
56report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Andrew Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Andrew Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 423 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andrew Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home