Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anderson Hatch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$237kHealth$201kReligion$114kCrime & Legal$105kHuman Services$101kFood & Nutrition$76kHousing & Shelter$52kMembership Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$35,000
BREAKTHROUGH T 1D$25,000
CITY OF HOPE$25,000
THE OTHER SIDE VILLAGE$25,000
WEST RIDGE ACADEMY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FOR THE KIDS$15,000
SJ COLLEGE OF LAW$15,000
WASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS$10,000
CHABAD OF UTAH COUNTY$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
BYU-PATHWAY WORLDWIDE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDHELP INC: $10k → 11%Frenship Foundation: $5k → 14%Childhelp Inc: $10k → 11%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $15k → 8%MODEST NEED FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%UTAH FOSTER CARE: $24k → 8%Utah Foster Care: $10k → 8%The Road Home: $10k → 8%The Road Home: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
WY
OH
PA
CA
UT
MD
AZ
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 17 repeat orgs$805k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
42

Total granted

$534k
$670k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+25%

Still filing today

47%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FOR THE KIDS ORG
    3× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +18%
  • PC
    PROJECT CONNECTION UTAH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $41k · revenue +94%
  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    4× · 2017–2022 · $35k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • JM
    JDRF Moutain West Chapter
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • LH
    LDS Humanitarian Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
2
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah

Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Education
3
Wasatch Homeless Health Care

Help homeless Utahns improve their health and quality of life by providing high-quality health care and support services.

Health
4
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc

Ronald McDonald House Mountain West surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.

Health
6
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
7
Friends of the Children - Utah

Friends of the children utah has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Youth Development
8
The Children's Center Utah

The mission of the children's center utah is to provide comprehensive mental health care to enhance the emotional well-being of infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their families. we are the only organization in utah and the largest in…

—
9
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
Project Read

Building bright futures through literacy, digital skills, math, and conversation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salt Lake City Rotary Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Haloti Ngata Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $115,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST RIDGE ACADEMY: $54,850 · OtherJDRF Moutain West Chapter: $50,000 · OtherPROJECT CONNECTION UTAH: $41,150 · OtherLDS Humanitarian Fund: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH office of advancement: $35,000 · Other+43 more: $555,170 · Other+43 moreUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $33,555 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME: $16,525 · Human ServicesAmerican Indian Services: $15,000 · Human ServicesMODEST NEEDS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesHope Clinic Inc: $30,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 · HealthAMANAKI FO'OU: $2,500 · HealthFOR THE KIDS ORG: $45,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionDONORSCHOOSEORG: $35,000 · EducationKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationThe Other Side Academy: $25,000 · Crime & LegalFamily Promise - Salt Lake: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,031,170Human Services$97,580Health$57,500Food & Nutrition$55,000Education$52,500Crime & Legal$25,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOR THE KIDS ORG: $45,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetPROJECT CONNECTION UTAH: $41,150 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $33,555 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHope Clinic Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise - Salt Lake: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $16,525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $11,324 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHaloti Ngata Family Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMAUI RESCUE MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDDI VANTAGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALT LAKE CITY ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMODEST NEEDS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalt Lake Education Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMANAKI FO'OU: $2,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOR THE KIDS ORG ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CONNECTION UTAH ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hope Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise - Salt Lake ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds American Indian Services ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Haloti Ngata Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAUI RESCUE MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable FoundationUT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American United Charitable Foundation · The Franks Family Foundation · Preston G Hughes Foundation Inc · Wheeler Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderson Hatch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson Hatch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anderson Hatch Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Anderson Hatch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anderson Hatch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph