Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anderson Family Foundation for Chri

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Housing & Shelter$37kInternational$24kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kReligion$5kHealth$500Crime & Legal$250Philanthropy$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP$5,000
FRESNO RESCUE MISSION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $1k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Multiplication Network Ministries

To equip church leaders with tools and resources to strengthen and multiply healthy churches. MORE CHURCHES is a modular program for church planting in which leaders are challenged to plant new churches through a proven strategy. Practical…

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Fresno New Creation Ministries Inc

Provide help for individuals and families affected by sexual and relational brokenness.

4
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

5
New Churches Now Inc

To spread the love of christ by providing physical, mental and spiritual aid to people in countries around the world through estalbishing churches and biblically faith-based communities.

International
6
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
7
Kingdom Ministries

Helping others live in freedom of Christ by knowing and living by the truths set for in God's word, the Holy Bible.

Religion
8
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
9
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
10
FresnoMadera Youth for Christ Inc

Youth for Christ reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of Jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to prayer and the Word of…

Youth Development
11
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
12
Xpansion Ministries

Church planting and leadership training.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Next Door Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $37,000 · Housing & ShelterFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INCCHANCES FOR CHILDREN — $22,820 · InternationalCHANCES FOR CHILDRENEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP — $5,000 · Human ServicesBreak the Barriers Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesFRESNO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $5,000 · EducationNext Door Ministries — $4,000 · ReligionEvangelicals for Social Action - Fresno — $500 · ReligionHAITIGO — $840 · OtherRIGHT TO LIFE OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA — $250 · OtherCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC — $250 · OtherASIAN PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC — $250 · OtherMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING — $250 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $500 · Health
Housing & Shelter$37,000International$22,820Human Services$6,000Education$5,000Religion$4,500Other$1,840Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $37,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHANCES FOR CHILDREN — $22,820 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFRESNO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNext Door Ministries — $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEvangelicals for Social Action - Fresno — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anderson Family Foundation for Chri funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph