Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anderson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$47kHealth$35kFood & Nutrition$34kEducation$30kArts & Culture$28kEnvironment$22kCrime & Legal$7kHousing & Shelter$4k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES$4,000
THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY$4,000
CRUSADERS HEALTH FOUNDATION$3,500
YWCA LITERACY COUNCIL$3,000
ROCKFORD FAMILY PEACE CENTER$3,000
NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE$3,000
BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE$1,250
CARPENTERS PLACE$1,250
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,250
CASA OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY$1,250
ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,000
THE SWEEDISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $7k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $6k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $4k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $4k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $4k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $4k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%THE ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $3k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $1k → 15%FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $1k → 15%FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $500 → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $500 → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $1k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$205k
$0

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +34%
  • RS
    ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +5%
  • NL
    NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +130%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

    Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

    Health
    2
    Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

    The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

    —
    3
    Land of Lincoln Goodwill Industries Inc

    To empower people with special needs to become self-sufficient through the power of work.

    Employment
    4
    Racine County Opportunity Center

    Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

    Human Services
    5
    The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

    The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

    Food & Nutrition
    6
    Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

    Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

    Health
    7
    Concord Mediation Center

    Organized for the purpose of assisting individuals and groups in the resolution and management of conflicts, promoting public awareness and understanding of alternative dispute resolutions, providing educational materials, workshops and…

    Crime & Legal
    8
    Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

    Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

    Employment
    9
    Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

    Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

    Community Improvement
    10
    Illinois Presbyterian Home

    Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises

    Human Services
    11
    Oak Park Residence Corporation

    The organization was established to promote the progress and general welfare of the residents of the village of oak park, illinois by improving or causing to be improved substandard oak park housing stock and developing projects and…

    —
    12
    Four County Comprehensive Mental Health Center Inc

    Dedicated to holistic care given with compassion, respect, acceptance and hope. achieving emotional well being and independence.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Literacy Council; the most unlike its peers is Natural Land Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $42,700 · OtherFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICESTHE LITERACY COUNCIL: $24,000 · OtherTHE LITERACY COUNCILYWCA LITERACY COUNCIL: $6,000 · OtherYWCA LITERACY COUNCILTHE SWEEDISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 · OtherTHE SWEEDISH HISTORICAL SOCIETYROCKFORD FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $5,000 · OtherROCKFORD FAMILY PEACE CENTER+2 more: $3,500 · OtherROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $33,500 · Human ServicesROCK RIVER VALLEY PANT…FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PEACE CENTERBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $1,750 · Human ServicesCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $1,750 · Human ServicesCRUSADERS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $33,000 · PhilanthropyCRUSADERS HEALTH F…ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $22,100 · Arts & CultureROCKFORD SYM…NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE: $22,100 · EnvironmentNATURAL LAND…
    Other$87,200Human Services$41,000Philanthropy$33,000Arts & Culture$22,100Environment$22,100

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $33,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCRUSADERS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LITERACY COUNCIL: $24,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $22,100 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE: $22,100 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PEACE CENTER: $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY ↗
    • Who funds CRUSADERS HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds THE LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
    • Who funds ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC ↗
    • Who funds NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY PEACE CENTER ↗
    • Who funds BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE ↗
    • Who funds CARPENTER'S PLACE INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008IL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Community Foundation of Northern IL · The Ben Harding Family Foundation · Gloyd Family Foundation · Sjostrom & Sons Foundation · Guy Reno Family Foundation · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Amended and Restated Brubaker Charitable Trust · United Way of Rock River Valley · American Endowment Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Anderson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Anderson Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph