Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anchor and Hope Sam R Sayers

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$584k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$4,000
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE$4,000
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE$4,000
EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
ROANOKE COLLEGE$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON$4,000
SWEET BRIAR COLLEGE$4,000
DAVIS AND ELKINS COLLEGE$4,000
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE$4,000
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE$4,000
LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY$4,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$4,000
KING UNIVERSITY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%KING UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $4k → 12%DAVIS AND ELKINS COLLEGE: $4k → 17%ROANOKE COLLEGE: $4k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $4k → 8%BRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $4k → 11%SWEET BRIAR COLLEGE: $4k → 13%CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE: $4k → 21%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 29%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $4k → 8%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE: $4k → 21%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE: $4k → 21%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE: $4k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
TN
NC
SC
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 32 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
43

Total granted

$388k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+21%

Still filing today

13%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $88k
  • RU
    RADFORD UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $28k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    3× · 2019–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • MB
    MADISON BROWN CO RADFORD UNIV
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • PB
    PERRY BURRESS CO LIBERTY UNIV
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • WA
    WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIV FBO HOLDEN
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
2
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
10
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
11
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
12
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Davis & Elkins College; the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE: $88,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATERADFORD UNIVERSITY: $28,000 · OtherRADFORD UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20,000 · Other+66 more: $380,000 · Other+66 moreLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $12,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVE…KING UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationKING UNIVERSI…ROANOKE COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationROANOKE COLLE…SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $8,000 · EducationSWEET BRIAR I…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF …DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationDAVIS & ELKIN…BRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationBRIDGEWATER C…Davidson College: $4,000 · EducationDavidson Coll…HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationHAMPDEN-SYDNE…Washington and Lee University: $4,000 · EducationWashington an…ASBURY COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationASBURY COLLEG…
Other$516,000Education$68,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKING UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEE UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISBURG COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDavidson College: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds KING UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Hughes Memorial Home · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anchor and Hope Sam R Sayers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anchor and Hope Sam R Sayers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anchor and Hope Sam R Sayers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph