Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anastasia & Kr Jenkins Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$27kHealth$1kHuman Services$205Education$115Arts & Culture$60Recreation & Sports$40
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$55
Median grant
3
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,220
DIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH$400
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY$380
NATIVITY OF MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH$75
Individual grant recipient$55
ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHRUCH$50
ST WENSESLAUS CATHOLIC CHRUCH$50
Individual grant recipient$25
ST BENEDICTS CATHOLIC CHURCH$25
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $180) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Boys Town: $75 → 12%Boys Town: $55 → 12%Boys Town: $50 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IA
PA
CT
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NM
KS
DC
MS
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Anastasia & Kr Jenkins Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 70%.

Anastasia & Kr Jenkins Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 34 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
30

Total granted

$39k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
-4%

Still filing today

12%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    3× · 2017–2019 · $180 · revenue +40%
  • PP
    PADRE PIO FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $105 · revenue +112%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $90 · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • FO
    Francis of the Holy Eucharist
    one grant, 2021 · $275
  • SV
    St Vincent DePaul Soiety
    one grant, 2019 · $115
  • IC
    Immaculate Conception Catholic Church
    one grant, 2023 · $50
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,180 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt John LaLande Catholic Church: $7,715 · OtherSt John LaLande Catholic ChurchCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY-ST JOSEPH: $4,350 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY-ST JOSEPHST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $1,385 · Other+58 more: $6,020 · Other+58 morePADRE PIO FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $105 · ReligionTHE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC: $90 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $75 · ReligionSt Francis Mission: $25 · ReligionFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $180 · Human Services
Other$39,650Religion$295Human Services$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPADRE PIO FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC: $90 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Mission: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds PADRE PIO FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alexander and Linda Milley FoundationNH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alexander and Linda Milley Foundation · Friel Foundation Inc · Rcp Foundation · The Salem Foundation · John & Barbara Friedrich Foundation · The A&S Giancristofaro Family Foundation Inc · David E & Mary C Gallo Foundation · The Halprin Family Foundation B · B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · Frederick Crescent C Tr Uw · The R&C Giancristofaro Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anastasia & Kr Jenkins Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anastasia & Kr Jenkins Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anastasia & Kr Jenkins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph