Skip to content
Amplify Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Amplify Inc

To forge partnerships with people with behavioral health needs, families and our communities to influence best practices, policies and access to resources.

$262k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$800kYouth Development$149kHuman Services$87kArts & Culture$39kRecreation & Sports$39kPhilanthropy$33k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $213,371, the rows itemized in this filing. The $261,632 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,261 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
$8,020
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AHM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$42,161
TOWN OF ENFIELD DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES$39,142
CATALYST CT INC$17,565
WINDSOR LOCKS WELLNESS COALITION$13,693
TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD$12,142
REGION 10 WELLNESS COALITION$10,896
SOUTH WINDSOR ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES$10,342
TOWN OF TOLLAND$9,153
TOWN OF EAST WINDSOR$8,020
SOUTHINGTON STEPS COALITION YOUTH SERVICES$7,142
TOWN OF MANCHESTER$7,142
NEW BRITAIN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$7,142
BRISTOL PARKS RECREATION YOUTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES$7,142
TOWN OF GLASTONBURY$5,663
TOWN OF WETHERSFIELD$5,342
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$997k · 25 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
15

Total granted

$997k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+371%

Still filing today

16%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +21%
  • MF
    MCCALL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +225%
  • CC
    CATALYST CT INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • EO
    East of the River
    one grant, 2018 · $39k
  • BP
    BOLTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • TO
    TOWN OF EAST GRANBY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOWN OF ENFIELD DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES: $95,302 · OtherTOWN OF ENFIELD DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICESSOUTHINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $73,296 · OtherSOUTHINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARYMANCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $57,902 · OtherMANCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLSCITY OF NEW BRITAIN: $55,238 · OtherCITY OF NEW BRITAINCITY OF BRISTOL: $50,760 · OtherMCCALL FOUNDATION INC: $48,304 · OtherNEWINGTON HUMAN SERVICES: $46,277 · OtherSOUTH WINDSOR ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES: $46,194 · OtherEast of the River: $38,900 · OtherTOWN OF WETHERSFIELD: $35,852 · Other+28 more: $432,736 · Other+28 moreANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $113,765 · Human ServicesANDOVER HEB…UNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC: $47,552 · PhilanthropyNew Life II Ministries Teaching You Another Way: $5,000 · Religion
Other$980,761Human Services$113,765Philanthropy$47,552Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $113,765 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMCCALL FOUNDATION INC: $48,304 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC: $47,552 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCATALYST CT INC: $22,565 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew Life II Ministries Teaching You Another Way: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL ACTION COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MCCALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CT INC ↗
  • Who funds New Life II Ministries Teaching You Another Way ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation f…Center for Technology…North Central Area Ag…Capital Area Substanc…Rockville Bank Commun…Connecticut Network f…Wheeler Clinic IncThe Hometown Foundati…United Way Inc United…AARPConnecticut Humanitie…Main Street Community…
Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT39.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Center for Technology and Civic Life · North Central Area Agency on Aging · Capital Area Substance Abuse Council Inc · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc · Wheeler Clinic Inc · The Hometown Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · AARP · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Main Street Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amplify Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amplify Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Mccall Foundation Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Catalyst Ct Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Southeastern Regional Action Council Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amplify’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home