· Private foundation
Aml Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN | $554 |
| Individual grant recipient | $172 |
| YESHIVA OHR YISRAEL | $100 |
| COUNT ME IN | $54 |
| Individual grant recipient | $54 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $36) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +269% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.
12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YCYESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN4× · 2021–2025 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2025 · $430
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2025 · $345
Funded once
- DLDETAILED LIST OF CHARITALE COTRIBUTIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FROMone grant, 2022 · $1k
- YOYESHIVA OHR YISROELone grant, 2023 · $700
- KYKEREN YESHUAH ISRAEL RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel
Charitable work to help people in need
Religious School
An institution for higher learning and study of talmudic law for post high school students, and students returning from their studies in israel, where they can further their education.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: F G Foundation · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Chesed Ahavah Foundation · Melvyn & Irene Greenstein Family Foundation · Joseph H Feldman Family Foundation Inc · The Margules Foundation Inc · The Tzedaka Fund · House of Gross Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Aml Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aml Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Aml’s filings →