Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Aml Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$984
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
23%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100
Largest grant, FY2025
$554
Organizations funded a year
1 to 20
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$82k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 23% of the organizations Aml Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 9% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
PhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$98433%
FY202413$2k23%
FY202320$3k45%
FY20221$1k100%
FY202118$1kn/a
88% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$6kInternational$644Philanthropy$521Human Services$384Food & Nutrition$144Health$90Public Safety & Disaster$54Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel$7001n/a
Refuah Yeshuah$3023n/a
Chmol Inc$2443n/a
Count Me in Inc$2414n/a
Feed Israel Foundation$22630%
Yeshiva Sholom Shachna$1563n/a
Masbia$10820%
Yeshiva Gedola Amudei Ohr Inc$1001n/a
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael Inc$1001n/a
Jewish Heritage for the Blind$541n/a
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Aml Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel$7001n/a
Refuah Yeshuah$3023n/a
Chmol Inc$2443n/a
Count Me in Inc$2414n/a
Feed Israel Foundation$22630%
Yeshiva Sholom Shachna$1563n/a
Masbia$10820%
Yeshiva Gedola Amudei Ohr Inc$1001n/a
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael Inc$1001n/a
Jewish Heritage for the Blind$541n/a
Jewish Childrens Fund$5410%
Zaka Tel-Aviv Inc$5410%
Childrens Village of Jerusalem Inc$5410%
Lev Malka Inc$3610%
Chai Lifeline Inc$3610%
Dorot Inc$3610%

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($6k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Aml Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeed Israel Foundation: $226 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMasbia: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Childrens Fund: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Village of Jerusalem Inc: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLev Malka Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChai Lifeline Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDorot Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

F G FoundationNY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: F G Foundation · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Chesed Ahavah Foundation · Melvyn & Irene Greenstein Family Foundation · Joseph H Feldman Family Foundation Inc · The Margules Foundation Inc · The Tzedaka Fund · House of Gross Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Aml Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Aml Charitable Foundation

How much does Aml Charitable Foundation give?
Aml Charitable Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $984 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 20 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Aml Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (71%), International (8%), Philanthropy (6%).
Who are Aml Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel ($700), Refuah Yeshuah ($302), Chmol Inc ($244).
Does Aml Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 23% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Aml Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Aml Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include F G Foundation, Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr, The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn.
Where is Aml Charitable Foundation based?
Aml Charitable Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aml’s filings →

More from the funding graph