Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund

To create a fair and just financial system that contributes to shared prosperity for all families and communities.

$399k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Public Benefit$2.0MCommunity Improvement$512kCivil Rights$500kEducation$269kYouth Development$102kCrime & Legal$40kReligion$11k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $170k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Americans for Financial Reform$300,000
Texas Appleseed$40,000
GA Watch$35,000
New Economy Project$25,000
New Jersey Citizen Action Education$20,000
Woodstock Institute$20,000
Maine Peoples Alliance$20,000
Citizen Action Illinois$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Prosperity Indiana: $44k → 16%Prosperity Indiana: $39k → 16%Prosperity Indiana: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ND
IL
WI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 19 repeat orgs$461k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$2.9M
$451k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+74%

Still filing today

89%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementPublic BenefitCivil RightsEducationReligionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas Appleseed
    4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +19%
  • VO
    VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $140k · revenue +51%
  • WI
    Woodstock Institute
    5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • AC
    Action Center on Race & the Economy Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $225k · revenue +282%
  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -21%
  • MA
    MH Action
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Action Institute Nc

Action institute nc is a community organization and citizens action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and…

—
2
Arkansas Public Policy Panel Inc

Ar public policy panel is a statewide organization dedicated to achieving social and economic justice by organizing citizen groups around the state, educating and supporting them to be more effective and powerful, and linking them with one…

Environment
3
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
4
New Jersey Citizen Action

To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.

—
5
People's Independent Commission

Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay

—
6
Power Coalition for Electoral Justice

We created the power coalition for electoral justice with our partners because this is a moment of opportunity; a time to dig in and become internationally strategic; in short, to use this movement to create a true paradigm shift. to plant…

Civil Rights
7
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
8
Alliance for Justice

Alliance for justice builds the strength of progressive movements by training and educating nonprofit organizations on advocacy, while harnessing their collective power to transform our state and federal courts.

Civil Rights
9
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
10
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
11
The Equal Voting Rights Institute

To protect and, where necessary, restore the primacy of all americans shared civil rights. the acr project exists to systematically sponsor litigation, file administrative complaints, participate in rulemaking, and educate both government…

Crime & Legal
12
Connecticut Citizen Action Group Inc

We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Missouri Faith Voices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Small Business Development …Native Hawaiian Community D…Veteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Americans for Financial Reform — $1,500,000 · OtherAmericans for Financial ReformWoodstock Institute — $110,000 · OtherWoodstock InstituteWISPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $74,700 · Other+7 more — $139,500 · Other+7 moreTexas Appleseed — $160,000 · Community ImprovementTexas AppleseedVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $139,500 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA ORGANIZIN…ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $55,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUS…NEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ECONOMY PROJEC…New York Communities Organizing Fund Inc — $45,500 · Community ImprovementNew York Communiti…INDIANA ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $44,000 · Community ImprovementINDIANA ASSOCIATIO…MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $40,000 · Community ImprovementMAINE PEOPLE'S ALL…PEOPLE'S ACTION — $22,500 · Community Improvement+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute — $225,000 · Civil RightsAction Cente…NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $90,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA …SOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $25,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH CAROLI…+2 more — $20,000 · Civil Rights+2 moreAlaska Public Interest Research Group — $110,000 · Public BenefitAlaska Pub…NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $79,500 · Public BenefitNEW JERSEY…GEORGIA WATCH — $55,000 · Public BenefitGEORGIA WA…VETERANS EDUCATION SUCCESS INC — $40,000 · Public BenefitVETERANS E…ALABAMA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC — $15,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $8,000 · Public BenefitACCE Institute — $95,000 · EducationGrassroots Collaborative — $20,000 · EducationCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC — $10,000 · EducationPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC — $5,000 · EducationVOICE Education Fund — $94,600 · ReligionTHE CONSENSUS COUNCIL INC — $10,500 · ReligionProsperity Enrichment Inc — $102,000 · Human Services
Other$1,824,200Community Improvement$566,500Civil Rights$360,000Public Benefit$307,500Education$130,000Religion$105,100Human Services$102,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmericans for Financial Reform — $1,500,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute — $225,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTexas Appleseed — $160,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $139,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWoodstock Institute — $110,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAlaska Public Interest Research Group — $110,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetProsperity Enrichment Inc — $102,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetACCE Institute — $95,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetVOICE Education Fund — $94,600 over 5y, 20% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $79,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWISPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $74,700 over 4y, 87% of budgetGEORGIA WATCH — $55,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNew York Communities Organizing Fund Inc — $45,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetINDIANA ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $44,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVETERANS EDUCATION SUCCESS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $34,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION — $22,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGrassroots Collaborative — $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetINDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA CONSUMER ACTION NETWORK INC — $15,500 over 2y, 44% of budgetFORWARD JUSTICE — $15,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMissouri Faith Voices Inc — $12,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE CONSENSUS COUNCIL INC — $10,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOOSIER ACTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCitizen Action Illinois — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC — $8,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Responsibl…Tides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundAmericans for Financi…Working Families Orga…All Hands on Deck Net…Proteus Fund IncSixteen Thirty FundHopewell FundConsumer Federation o…Communications Worker…
Center for Responsible LendingNC24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Responsible Lending · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Americans for Financial Reform · Working Families Organization Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Hopewell Fund · Consumer Federation of America · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines