Skip to content

· Public charity

American Vets Group Foundation Inc

Volunteering and donating funds to u.s.

$149k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Employment$477kHealth$90kCommunity Improvement$45kEducation$39kHousing & Shelter$33kHuman Services$18kPublic Benefit$6k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $122,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $148,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VETJOBS$94,500
ON COURSE FOUNDATION$20,000
THE WORKPLACE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM: $8k → 11%OPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 7 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$410k
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EmploymentPublic BenefitEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VI
    VetJobs Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +22%
  • OC
    ON COURSE FOUNDATION USA
    3× · 2021–2024 · $63k · revenue +181%
  • FB
    FOUR BLOCK FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BW
    BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $78k · revenue +214%
  • CV
    COHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +5%
  • BL
    BUNKER LABS NFP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
2
Vetality Corp

Services for veterans

—
3
Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

Public Benefit
4
Hire Heroes Usa Inc

Hire heroes usa empowers u.s. military members, veterans and military spouses to succeed in the civilian workforce. as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, hire heroes usa's services are provided at no cost to the client.

Education
5
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
6
Acronis Scs Vets

Returning veteran and veteran spouse computer cyber security education

—
7
Hookin Veterans
Public Benefit
8
The Honor Foundation Inc

Assists u.s. special operation forces transition from active duty military to private sector careers.

Employment
9
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
10
Ascending Career Solutions Group Inc

Counseling for veteran issues relationships and career guidance

—
11
Support Our Soldiers

Provide financial support for veterans.

Human Services
12
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Call of Duty Endowment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VetJobs Inc: $144,500 · EmploymentVetJobs IncFOUR BLOCK FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EmploymentFOUR BLOCK FOUNDATION INCJVS SOCAL: $27,000 · EmploymentJVS SOCALMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER: $20,000 · EmploymentMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTERMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS: $15,000 · EmploymentMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANSTHE WORKPLACE INC: $14,500 · EmploymentTHE WORKPLACE INCUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $108,000 · EducationUS Chamber of Commer…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,500 · EducationPresident and Fellow…SOLDIER STRONG INC: $6,300 · EducationTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $5,250 · EducationON COURSE FOUNDATION USA: $62,650 · Public BenefitON COURSE FOU…CHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $7,500 · Public BenefitCHRISTOPHER C…WARRIORS 4 WIRELESS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6,000 · Public BenefitWARRIORS 4 WI…UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $5,500 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVIC…BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $77,500 · HealthBOB WOODRUFF…COHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyCOHEN VETE…Warrior Rising: $6,500 · PhilanthropyWarrior Ri…BUNKER LABS NFP INC: $30,000 · OtherBUNKER LAB…VANTAGE POINT FOUNDATION: $13,100 · OtherVANTAGE PO…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherNAVY SEAL …HOMES FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 · OtherHOMES FOR …OPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC: $8,400 · Human Services
Employment$261,000Education$127,050Public Benefit$81,650Health$77,500Philanthropy$66,500Other$63,100Human Services$30,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVetJobs Inc: $144,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $108,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $77,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetON COURSE FOUNDATION USA: $62,650 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetCOHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUR BLOCK FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBUNKER LABS NFP INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJVS SOCAL: $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WORKPLACE INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVANTAGE POINT FOUNDATION: $13,100 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetOPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CALL OF DUTY ENDOWMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC: $8,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWarrior Rising: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOLDIER STRONG INC: $6,300 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWARRIORS 4 WIRELESS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bob Woodruff Family Foundation IncNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Disabled Veterans National Foundation · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · Pwc Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Vets Group Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Vets Group Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 77%
  • The Workplace Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Community Renewal Team Inc: 77% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Cohen Veterans Network Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Vets Group Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to American Vets Group Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Vets Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph