Skip to content
American Urological Association Education and Research Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Urological Association Education and Research Inc

To improve practice and patient care by providing affordable quality urological education.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.9MEducation$255kScience & Tech$185kInternational$80kHuman Services$6k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $2,000,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,060,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$261M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION$2,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
KY
MD
KS
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 4 repeat orgs$649k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
27

Total granted

$3.7M
$649k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+62%

Still filing today

100%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’25
HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +69%
  • IM
    IVU MED
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +56%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $70k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +44%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Ivu Med. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,550,000 · HealthUROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC+7 more: $123,930 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $40,000 · OtherMEMORIAL S…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $40,000 · OtherREGENTS OF…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherMASS GENER…THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY: $24,000 · OtherTHE AMERIC…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $20,000 · OtherDynamic Object Language Labs Inc: $20,000 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY UROLOGIC SURGERY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $20,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $20,000 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $45,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $40,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $20,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $20,000 · EducationIVU MED: $80,000 · InternationalCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $5,500 · Human Services
Health$3,673,930Other$419,000Education$255,000International$80,000Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,550,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR BASIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetKIDNEY CANCER COALITION KIDNEYCAN: $7,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $6,930 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Urology Care Foundati…Fidelity Investments …
Urology Care Foundation IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Urology Care Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Urological Association Education and Research Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Urological Association Education and Research Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Urological Association Education and Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home