Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

The professional, scientific, and credentialing association for clinical and research based audiologists and speech-language pathologists.

$808k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$10MEducation$348kCivil Rights$60kCommunity Improvement$31kScience & Tech$15kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$14k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $459,303 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $808,004 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $348,701 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $82k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$13,950
Median grant
7
States reached
$184M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Natl Assn for Hearing and Spch Action$300,000
American Speech-Language-Hearing Fdn$82,310
State University of Iowa$15,000
Univ of the DC$14,733
Syracuse Univ$13,950
The Univ of MS$11,210
Univ of South FL$10,000
ASAE - Summit Awards Dinner Table$6,600
CO Spch-Lang-Hearing Assoc$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Massachusetts Speech-Language-Hearing Assn: $9k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $12k → 16%MINNESOTA SLHA: $11k → 11%SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%University of Southern California: $14k → 14%Syracuse Univ: $14k → 14%Research Foundation for SUNY: $15k → 14%University of North Texas: $11k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $10k → 14%Univ of South FL: $10k → 13%Iowa Speech Langugage Hearing Assoc: $9k → 10%State University of Iowa: $15k → 15%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%KUMC Research Institute: $15k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $8k → 16%East Carolina University: $15k → 20%Amer Board of Voice&Upper Airway Disorders: $63k → 8%Utah State University: $15k → 12%Children's Hospital Medical Center: $15k → 16%Case Western Reserve University: $11k → 17%The Univ of MS: $11k → 18%William Paterson University of New Jersey: $10k → 12%South Dakota SLHA: $8k → 13%American Speech Language Hearing Foundation: $1.9M → 8%Haitian American Caucus: $10k → 11%Massachusetts Speech-Language-Hearing Assn: $9k → 8%Minnesota Speech Language Hearing Assoc: $9k → 11%Syracuse University: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $9k → 14%American Speech Language Hearing Fdn: $1.7M → 8%American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation: $1.0M → 8%AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING FOUNDATION: $884k → 8%American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation: $864k → 8%Univ of the DC: $15k → 14%AMERICAN SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING FOUNDATION: $849k → 8%American Speech Language Hearing Fdn: $827k → 8%National Association for Hearing and Speech Action: $350k → 8%Natl Assn for Hearing and Spch Action: $300k → 8%Ntl Assoc for Hearing and Speech Action: $300k → 8%National Association for Hearing and Speech Act: $300k → 8%University of Pittsburgh: $11k → 11%Nat'l Association for Hearing & Speech Act: $200k → 8%AMERICAN BOARD OF AUGMENTATIVE: $30k → 11%Nat'l Association For Hearing & Speech Act: $200k → 8%Amer Board of Augmentative & Altern Comm: $21k → 11%National Student Speech Language Hearing Associati: $100k → 8%American Board of Augmentative: $12k → 11%American Speech-Language-Hearing Fdn: $82k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
KY
VA
MD
NM
KS
NC
SC
DC
HI
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 21 repeat orgs$501k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
34

Total granted

$10M
$450k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+9%

Still filing today

81%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ACTION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +84% · 83% of their budget
  • CS
    COLORADO SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +61%
  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
    2× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NS
    NATIONAL STUDENT SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -4%
  • AB
    AMERICAN BOARD OF VOICE AND UPPER AIRWAY DISORDERS
    one grant, 2021 · $63k · 100% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +129%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

The professional, scientific, and credentialing association for clinical and research based audiologists and speech-language pathologists. empowering and supporting speech-language pathologists, audiologists, and speech, language, and…

2
Association of Medical Professionals With Hearing Losses

Educational

Health
3
Ohio Speech Language Hearing Assn

Serves the needs of audiologists and speech pathologists in the state of ohio by providing support opportunities for the professional growth, public awareness and advocacy of issues related to the highest care of the individuals they serve.

4
Assn for the Study of Language in Prehistory Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Speech and Hearing Association of Alabama

SHAA works to educate healthcare professional specializing in speech-language pathology; audiology; and speech, language or hearing sciences.

6
American Association for Applied Linguistics Inc

The american association for applied linguistics is a professional society whose members use a wide variety of theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches to address a broad range of language-related issues that affect individuals…

Social Science
7
American Laryngological Association

Promote education and research and disseminate important information relative to laryngology, the study of basic science, promoting and presenting the latest scientific discoveries, publishing peer-reviewed reports, establishing funding…

8
Hearing Loss Association of America

Hlaa opens the world of communication to people with hearing loss through information, education, support and advocacy. hlaa is the leading voice of the growing number of people with hearing loss in the u.s. hlaa advocates for…

Human Services
9
Collegium Oto-Rhino-Laryngologicum Amicitiae Sacrum-Us Group Inc

The primary purpose of the corlas-us group is to promote and encourage improvements in the quality and delivery of treatment within the practice of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery, through the use of educational and academic…

Health
10
International Listening Association

Research & education in listening

Social Science
11
Csha Foundation

Provide scholarship funds for qualifying csha student members who are pursuing degrees in the fields of speech language pathology, communication sciences and disorders, communicative disorders, and audiology.

Education
12
Colorado Academy of Audiology

The Colorado Academy of Audiology is organized for the purpose of promoting thepublic good by fostering growth, development, recognition, and status of theprofession of Audiology and its members.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Speech-Language-Hearing Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr11%40%35–55yr16%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%0%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr16%97%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,789

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
20/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING FOUNDATION — $8,139,043 · HealthAMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING FOUNDATIONNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ACTION — $1,650,000 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ACTION+5 more — $225,415 · HealthAMERICAN BOARD OF AUGMENTATIVE — $62,635 · OtherCOLORADO SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION — $47,961 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS SPEECH-LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION INC — $31,900 · OtherCALIFORNIA SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · OtherMontana Speech Language & Hearing Assn — $19,750 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH — $18,995 · Other+35 more — $337,575 · OtherThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $29,848 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $23,950 · EducationTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY — $14,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $13,600 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $12,049 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $11,200 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $11,000 · EducationSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY — $7,000 · EducationASAE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $30,600 · Community ImprovementWI SPEECH-LANGUAGE-PATHOLOGY & AUDIOLOGY ASSOCIATION INC — $14,650 · Community ImprovementNEVADA SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION INC — $5,750 · Community ImprovementUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $15,000 · Science & Tech
Health$10,014,458Other$538,816Education$122,647Community Improvement$51,000Science & Tech$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING FOUNDATION — $8,139,043 over 8y, 59% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ACTION — $1,650,000 over 6y, 83% of budgetNATIONAL STUDENT SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN BOARD OF VOICE AND UPPER AIRWAY DISORDERS — $62,635 over 1y, 100% of budgetCOLORADO SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION — $47,961 over 7y, 16% of budgetMINNESOTA SPEECH LANGUAGE & HEARING ASSOCIATION — $32,780 over 4y, 13% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SPEECH-LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION INC — $31,900 over 4y, 31% of budgetASAE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $30,600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $29,848 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $23,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMontana Speech Language & Hearing Assn — $19,750 over 3y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING — $14,850 over 2y, 13% of budgetWI SPEECH-LANGUAGE-PATHOLOGY & AUDIOLOGY ASSOCIATION INC — $14,650 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION — $13,900 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $13,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC OF VA — $13,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $12,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION — $11,900 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOREGON SPEECH-LANGUAGE & HEARING ASSOCIATION — $11,579 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $11,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Speech Language Hearing Association — $7,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetKENTUCKY SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA SPEECH-LANGUAGE- HEARING ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGEORGIA SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMISSOURI SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetKANSAS SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNEVADA SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION INC — $5,750 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetMaryland Speech-Language-Hearing Association — $5,750 over 1y, 10% of budgetNY STATE SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO SPEECH AND HEARING ASSN — $5,100 over 1y, 7.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Chemical SocietyDC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Chemical Society · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Speech-Language-Hearing Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph