· Public charity
American Psychological Foundation
The AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION provides financial support for innovative research and programs that enhance the power of psychologyto elevate the human condition and advance human potential both now and in generations to come.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 38 grants below total $1,065,719 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,459,554 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $393,835 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $706k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $354k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSN | $224,890 |
| APF ACCESS LLC | $128,875 |
| PALO ALTO UNIVERSITY INC | $34,000 |
| COALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD DBA ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY | $30,545 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $29,497 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $28,000 |
| TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $25,000 |
| THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DENVER | $25,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY | $22,500 |
| EMORY UNIVERSITY ATTN EPEX 63905 | $22,440 |
| AMERICAN UNIVERSITY | $22,332 |
| PACIFIC UNIVERSITY | $22,000 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES | $22,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $558k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION6× · 2019–2024 · $654k · revenue +11%
- APAMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $324k · revenue +288%
- EUEmory University3× · 2018–2024 · $64k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXASone grant, 2017 · $50k
DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $48k · revenue +51%- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLEone grant, 2019 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Education and Research
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University and the most unlike its peers is Psychotherapy Action Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 65 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds ALLIANT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Rhode Island Hospital ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Chicago School - California Inc ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Foundation for Suicide Prevention · American Chemical Society · Northeastern University · Northwestern University · Washington University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Johns Hopkins University · Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc · National Academy of Sciences · Drexel University · Trustees of Boston University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Psychological Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Pacific University — 2% of income from government
- Fairleigh Dickinson University — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Hartford Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Austen Riggs Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to American Psychological Foundation?
Find your warmest path to American Psychological Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.