Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Legion Auxiliary Dept of Minnes

In the spirit of service, not self, the mission of the american legion auxiliary is to support the american legion and to honor the sacrifice of those who serve by enhancing the lives of our veterans, military, and their families, both at home and abroad.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPT OF MINNES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $122,908 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $196,073 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,165 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
$21,195
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARMED FORCES CENTER$27,618
MINNESOTA VETERANS HOME$25,647
AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY FOUNDATION INC$25,480
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$21,195
MINNESOTA AMERICAN LEGION AND AUXILIARY BRAIN SCIENCE FOUNDATION$6,955
LEGIONVILLE SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL TRAINING CNETER INC$5,570
AMERICAN LEGION FAMILY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$5,428
AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY$5,015
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $21k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$513k · 8 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$513k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-11%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $92k · revenue +29%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $84k · revenue +28%
  • MA
    MINNESOTA AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY AND THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue ×12 · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARMED FORCES CENTER — $93,092 · OtherARMED FORCES CENTERAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS — $92,298 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERSFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $83,907 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCMINNESOTA VETERANS HOME FAMILY COUNCIL-MINNEAPOLIS — $32,731 · OtherMINNESOTA VETERANS HOME FAMILY COUNCIL-MINNEAPOLISMINNESOTA AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY AND THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN — $26,618 · OtherMINNESOTA AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY AND THE SONS OF THE AMERICANLEGIONVILLE SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL TRAINING CENTER INC — $23,035 · OtherLEGIONVILLE SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL TRAINING CENTER INCAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY FNDN — $144,633 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY FNDNBELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS INC — $20,588 · Human ServicesAMERICAN LEGION FAMILY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $16,382 · Health
Other$351,681Community Improvement$144,633Human Services$20,588Health$16,382

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY FNDN — $144,633 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS — $92,298 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $83,907 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY AND THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN — $26,618 over 4y, 35% of budgetLEGIONVILLE SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL TRAINING CENTER INC — $23,035 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS INC — $20,588 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION FAMILY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $16,382 over 3y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Legion Auxiliary Dept of Minnes funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph