· Public charity
American Insurance Association Inc
The american insurance association (aia) is a member organization, the purpose of which is to promote the economic, legislative, and public standing of its participating property and casualty insurers; to provide a forum for the discussion of problems that are of common concern to member companies; to promote the interests of such…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $368,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $503,145 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $134,745 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $201k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REPUBLIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| AIA CALIFORNIA PAC | $50,900 |
| DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| RAND CORPORATION | $40,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $37,500 |
| THE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE | $27,500 |
| INSURANCE COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY | $25,000 |
| RIPON SOCIETY INC | $20,000 |
| INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS | $10,000 |
| HOOPS FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +53%
- RSRipon Society Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +28%
- IIINDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS OF AMERICA2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- IIINSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -34%
- RPRepublican Party of Floridaone grant, 2017 · $10k
- TCTHE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The iib represents the interests of the international banking community before u.s. legislative/regulatory bodies liaises with international regulatory bodies serves as a source of information to the media and other interested parties…
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
Educate/advocate for effective corporate governance and public company disclosure, strong shareholder rights and fair capital markets.
Apcia promotes and protects the viability of a competitive private insurance market for the benefit of consumers and insurers.
Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
The National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (NAICU) serves as the unified voice for the 1,700 private, nonprofit colleges and universities in our nation. (continued on Schedule O)
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
The american institute of certified public accountants is a membership organization whose primary exempt purposes are to serve and unite the accountancy profession, to develop and maintain high professional standards, to advance the…
The institutes provides educational offerings to the public regarding risk management and insurance.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Insurance Information Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Ripon Society Inc ↗
- Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
- Who funds INSURANCE COUNCIL OF NJ INC ↗
- Who funds INSURANCE INFORMATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS ↗
- Who funds CALVIN COOLIDGE PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Texans for Lawsuit Reform ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Property Casualty Insurance Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · Biotechnology Innovation Organization · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Insurance Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.