Skip to content

· Public charity

American Friends of Kupat Ha'Ir

To raise funds for distribution to institutions organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable and educational purposes in the united states and israel with a view toward providing aid, assistance and support to needy and indigent individuals in israel and the united states.

$8.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MInternational$50k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $32,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,038,550 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,006,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL$20,300
IGUD YEHUDEI ZHITOMIR$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND INC: $50k → 13%CONG YESHUOS YAAKOV: $5k → 14%BAIS CHUNA: $11k → 20%CHASDEI AVOS INC: $22k → 11%BEIS AHARON VYISROEL INC: $620k → 14%CONGREGATION RACHMISTRIVKA: $52k → 20%AREIVIM: $17k → 14%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL: $44k → 20%CONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INC: $40k → 20%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL: $30k → 20%EZRAS YISROEL: $22k → 20%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL: $20k → 20%AHAVAS TZEDAKA V'CHESED: $20k → 20%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL OF BOYAN: $16k → 20%MESIVTA TIFERES YISOREL RIZHIN: $14k → 20%RAV CHESED: $13k → 20%IGUD YEHUDEI ZHITOMIR: $12k → 20%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL: $11k → 20%CONGREGATION KSAV SOFER INC: $10k → 20%AREIVIM USA: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION YESHIVA DARKEI CHAIM: $10k → 20%CONGREGATION G MACH YASHREISH YAKOV: $14k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $8.0M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$8.0M · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year: $620,000 · Public BenefitBeis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next YearCONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL: $143,075 · OtherCONGREGATION EZRAS YISROELCONGREGATION RACHMISTRIVKA INC: $51,500 · OtherCONGREGATION RACHMISTRIVKA INCCOORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND INC: $50,000 · OtherCOORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND …CONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INC: $40,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INCCHASDEI AVOS INC: $22,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $20,000 · OtherAREIVIM: $17,000 · Other+8 more: $79,000 · Other+8 moreMESIVTA TIFERETH ISRAEL OF RIZHIN JERUSALEM INC: $14,000 · Religion
Public Benefit$620,000Other$422,575Religion$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBeis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year: $620,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetCOORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMESIVTA TIFERETH ISRAEL OF RIZHIN JERUSALEM INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year ↗
  • Who funds COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA TIFERETH ISRAEL OF RIZHIN JERUSALEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY31.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Partners in Giving Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Kupat Ha'Ir funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Kupat Ha'Ir. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Friends of Kupat Ha'Ir?

    Find your warmest path to American Friends of Kupat Ha'Ir through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Friends of Kupat Ha'Ir’s filings →

    More from the funding graph