Skip to content

· Public charity

American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

$14M
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Crime & Legal$1.1MHuman Services$990kReligion$574kEducation$12k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $1,391,198, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,102,098 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,710,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,091,198
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Khal Beis Aba$1,091,198
CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED$300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CONG OF ECHO RIDGE: $7k → 14%CONG MOSAD KEREN HATZOLE: $400k → 20%CONG MOSAD KEREN HATZOLE: $275k → 20%CONG MOSAD KEREN HATZOLA: $100k → 20%TOVA UVRUCHA INC: $100k → 20%UNITED MOSDOS TORAH VEYIRAH YERUSHOLYIM INC: $30k → 20%BEER MIRIAM INC: $10k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED: $300k → 20%KHAL BLEV ECHOD: $30k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $15k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED: $15k → 20%CONG BOYANER KLOIZ TIFERETH MORDECHAI SHLOMO: $10k → 20%THE RABBI SOLOMON KLUGER SCHOOL INC: $70k → 20%Khal Beis Aba: $1.1M → 20%KHAL BEIS ABA: $85k → 20%CONG YESHIVAS BAIS MOSHE: $24k → 20%ATERES ZVI: $12k → 20%CONG EMUNAS YISROEL: $6k → 20%YESHIVA GEDOLEH OHR YISROEL: $20k → 20%YESHIVA GEDOLEH OHR YISROEL: $17k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 4 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$2.4M
$284k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KB
    Khal Beis Aba
    2× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M
  • CM
    CONG MOSAD KEREN HATZOLE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M
  • UM
    UNITED MOSDOS TORAH VEYIRAH YERUSHOLYIM INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $80k

Funded once

  • TU
    TOVA UVRUCHA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • TR
    THE RABBI SOLOMON KLUGER SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $70k
  • KB
    KHAL B LEV ECHOD
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2023.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Khal Beis Aba: $1,176,198 · OtherKhal Beis AbaCONG MOSAD KEREN HATZOLE: $1,090,000 · OtherCONG MOSAD KEREN HATZOLETOVA UVRUCHA INC: $100,000 · Other+11 more: $300,700 · Other+11 more
Other$2,666,898

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATERES ZVI FUND: $12,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATERES ZVI FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY24.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc?

Find your warmest path to American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Friends of Israel Organizations’ filings →

More from the funding graph