Skip to content

· Private foundation

American Friends of Gedulat Mordech

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MHuman Services$394kPhilanthropy$48kEducation$10kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$138
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERKAZ TORANI ORAITA$33,200
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATI$10,000
AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NOTNIM TIKVA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $10k → 20%MESILA INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 20%MESILA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$467k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
34

Total granted

$1.1M
$456k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-26%

Still filing today

31%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CHAYIM V CHESED
    4× · 2018–2021 · $370k · revenue +84%
  • YK
    YESHIVA KARLIN STOLIN
    5× · 2017–2023 · $228k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH HILLEL OF SERDAHELY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $118k

Funded once

  • LT
    LOMDEI TORAH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH ARON VISRAEL
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVETH ACHIM ANSHEI
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshivas D'var Torah Inc

Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research

Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Torah

Promoting education by providing financial assistance and support services to educational organizations worldwide; to promote the jewish religion and jewish education through provision of educational programs, assisting the creation of…

Philanthropy
4
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
5
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
6
Keren Otzar Hachaim Inc

To further religious jewish education for children and young adults in israel both directly, by using advanced education methods, and indirectly, by supporting the development of future teachers by subsidizing their education and training.…

Education
7
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
8
Friends of Hadar Yisroel Netanya Inc

To financially assist poor talmudic scholars in israel with their day to day basic living expenses.

Religion
9
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
10
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
11
Yeshuas Chaim Inc

Promoting torah learning in israel; promoting awareness of todays mental health challenges and to provide financial assistance to individuals and families suffering from mental and emotional health issues. the organization will also…

Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mesila International Inc (prev Irgun Siddur Chovos). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA KARLIN STOLIN: $227,500 · OtherYESHIVA KARLIN STOLINCONGREGATION BETH HILLEL OF SERDAHELY INC: $118,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH HILLEL OF SERDAHELY INCIndividual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNOAM SHABBOS INC: $75,000 · OtherNOAM SHABBOS INCLOMDEI TORAH: $50,000 · OtherCONG KOLLEL CHESED INC: $37,000 · Other+35 more: $482,150 · Other+35 moreCHAYIM V CHESED: $370,000 · ReligionCHAYIM V CHESED+2 more: $22,000 · Religion+2 moreMERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC: $48,200 · PhilanthropyMesila International Inc (prev Irgun Siddur Chovos): $14,000 · Human ServicesAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLAMDEINI INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentYESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV: $6,000 · Education
Other$1,084,650Religion$392,000Philanthropy$48,200Human Services$24,000Youth Development$10,000Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $370,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC: $48,200 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMesila International Inc (prev Irgun Siddur Chovos): $14,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAMDEINI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYAD YISROEL: $5,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds NOAM SHABBOS INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mesila International Inc (prev Irgun Siddur Chovos) ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMDEINI INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY42.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Gedulat Mordech funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Gedulat Mordech. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Friends of Gedulat Mordech’s filings →

    More from the funding graph