· Public charity
American Federation of State County AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 3299
To protect and preserve the union as a whole in the performance of its legal and contractual obligations.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of American Federation of State County AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 3299’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $145k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AFSCME LU 3299 Indep Expend Committee | $1,086,020 |
| Equality California | $145,000 |
| United Farm Workers | $25,000 |
| Rutgers The State University | $25,000 |
| Jobs with Justice San Francisco | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOAlliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +21%
- UFUNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +17%
- TCTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE3× · 2018–2021 · $45k · revenue +97%
Funded once
- UBUC BERKELEY COOKS CUSTODIANS AND NURSING ASSISTANone grant, 2023 · $1.6M
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $182k
- ALAFSCME LOCAL 3299 PACone grant, 2018 · $106k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.
The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…
to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…
The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.
Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…
To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…
Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists. cal chamber publishes books and software related to…
The North Valley Labor Federations mission is to grow and strengthen the labor movement and build a strong political voice for working families in the Northern San Joaquin Valley.
CAUSE's mission is to build grassroots power to realize social, economic and environmental justice for the people of the Central Coast Region through policy research, leadership development, organizing and advocacy.
To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working Families Organization Inc and the most unlike its peers is Coalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the Ca Labor Federation Afl-Cio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EQUALITY CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL COALITION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FIRST ↗
- Who funds UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Jobs with Justice San Francisco ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL & MAIN ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTO AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL WORKERS O ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Coalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Nurses Association · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · United Domestic Workers of America · Seiu Local 2015 · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · Liberty Hill Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Federation of State County AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 3299 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.