Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations

To organize all workers for the econimic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$60kCivil Rights$32kEnvironment$27kPhilanthropy$19kHuman Services$17kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$64k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $84,712 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $74,712 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISERICORDIA HOME OF MERCY: $10k → 14%UFCW LOCAL #881 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$151k · 5 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$151k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+62%

Still filing today

80%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    Illinois Institute of Technology
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • US
    UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +6%
  • CA
    Citizen Action Illinois
    3× · 2017–2019 · $26k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • VY
    VOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTS
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • JW
    JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +129%
  • IE
    ILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Citizen Action Illinois Education Fund

Public education on current public policy issues

Public Benefit
2
Illinois Business Alliance

The illinois business alliance is a nonprofit, member-driven business league that exists to improve illinois' business climate and promote the common economic interests of its members.

3
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

4
Illinois Manufacturers' Association

To strengthen the economic social environmental and governmental conditions for manufacturing and allied enterprises in the state of illinois, resulting in an englarged business base and increased employment.

5
Citizens Utility Board

To promote the health, welfare and prosperity of all the citizens of illinois by ensuring effective and democratic representation of utility consumers.

6
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

7
Change Illinois Action Fund

Change illinois action fund is dedicated to advocating for solutions to the issues that undermine democracy and government efficiency in illinois, including restricted ballot access, uncompetitive elections, decreased citizen…

8
Illinois Retail Merchants Association

To conduct a commercial, industrial, or trade association for the benefit of persons engaged in retail trade in the state of illinois.

9
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
10
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
11
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois

Defend freedom of speech, press, assembly, and other rights guaranteed by the us constitution and the constitution of the state of illinois.

12
A I a Illinois

Empowered by members to champion the profession of architecture.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equality Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Illinois Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ILLINOIS ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS — $31,000 · OtherILLINOIS ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED A…VOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTS — $16,765 · OtherVOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTSST PATRICKS DAY PARADE COMM OF CHICAGO co James Coyne President — $16,500 · OtherST PATRICKS DAY PARADE COMM OF …Illinois Institute of Technology — $50,000 · EducationIllinois Institute of Technol…JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $10,000 · EducationJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTDCitizen Action Illinois — $26,200 · Civil RightsCitizen Action …Illinois Alliance for Retired Americans — $6,000 · Civil RightsIllinois Allian…UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE — $26,932 · EnvironmentUNION SPORTSM…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MACON COUNTY — $10,250 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMU…EQUALITY ILLINOIS — $8,500 · PhilanthropyEQUALITY …MISERICORDIA HOME — $10,000 · Human ServicesUFCW LOCAL 881 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Human ServicesILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$64,265Education$60,000Civil Rights$32,200Environment$26,932Philanthropy$18,750Human Services$17,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIllinois Institute of Technology — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE — $26,932 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCitizen Action Illinois — $26,200 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetST PATRICKS DAY PARADE COMM OF CHICAGO co James Coyne President — $16,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MACON COUNTY — $10,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY ILLINOIS — $8,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetIllinois Alliance for Retired Americans — $6,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph