Skip to content

· Public charity

American Constructors Foundation

AMERICAN CONSTRUCTORS FOUNDATION is a nonprofit corporation with a focus of bringing lasting and positive impacts to communities by funding charitable and/or educational organizations, organizing and/or supporting service projects, providing educational scholarships and providing support for other opportunities that benefit our community.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$410kEducation$157kHealth$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $171,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $192,097 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,597 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$10,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA$110,000
LEANDER EDUCATION EXCELLENCE FUND$15,000
DRIPPING SPRINGS EDUCATION FND$14,500
LAKE TRAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,500
ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION$10,000
BASTROP EDUCATION FOUNDATION$6,000
TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DRIPPING SPRINGS EDUCATION FND: $15k → 10%LAKE TRAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11k → 10%BASTROP EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%DRIPPING SPRINGS EDUCATION FND: $14k → 10%LAKE TRAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%BASTROP EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA: $110k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA: $100k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA: $100k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA: $70k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA: $30k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%DEL VALLE ISD EDUCATION: $8k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of American Constructors Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

American Constructors Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$704k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$704k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+68%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $200k · revenue +40%
  • LE
    LEANDER EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +61%
  • SD
    ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AC
    Austin Community College Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +68%
  • DV
    Del Valle Isd Education Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Porte Education Foundation

Grants provided to teachers to fund innovative, creative, instructional projects for students and teachers and to fund scholarships in La Porte ISD schools.

Education
2
Aldine Education Foundation

To provide community-based support to the aldine independent school district in pursuit of excellence in teaching innovation in the classroom and superior learning opportunities for all students

Education
3
Denison Isd Education Foundation

The foundation (1) awards grants for administrators compensation (2) administers student scholarships (3) awards innovative teaching grants to the professional staff of the disd (4) honors students at award banquets.

Education
4
Tatum Independent School Dist Education Foundation

Funds received exclusively for the support of education projects of tatum independent school district and student scholarships for those pursuing higher education.

Education
5
Bryan Isd Education Foundation

To aid in the fulfillment of teaching and service functions of the Bryan Independent School District by providing funds and property.

Education
6
Ector County Isd Education Foundation

Provide grant funding for ecisd students & teachers

Education
7
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

—
8
Santa Fe Texas Education Foundation Inc

The Santa Fe Texas Education Foundation CULTIVATES and NURTURES the culture of generosity in our community, IGNITES exemplary experiences for every student and teacher, and INSPIRES the achievement of lifelong success.

Education
9
Frisco Education Foundation

To provide scholarships to graduating high school students in the Frisco Independent School District. The Foundation also supports educational programs and educators in the District through Grants for Great Ideas.

Philanthropy
10
Dickinson Isd Education Foundation Inc

The Dickinson ISD Education Foundation's mission is to ensure that all students have successful learning opportunities that help them reach their full potential and add quality throughout their lives.

Education
11
Canyons School District Education Foundation

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education
12
Education Foundation of Canyon Isd

To generate and distribute resources to provide enhancements for excellence in education to Canyon ISD, its students and staff.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Temple Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Clubs of Austin and Travis County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREA: $210,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AUSTIN AREAIndividual grant recipient: $143,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDRIPPING SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,500 · OtherDRIPPING SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONLake Travis Education Foundation: $18,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN …LEANDER EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $64,000 · EducationLEANDER EDUCATION…Austin Community College Foundation: $15,000 · EducationAustin Community …Bastrop Education Foundation: $12,000 · EducationBastrop Education…TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $11,250 · EducationTEMPLE EDUCATION …Del Valle Isd Education Foundation: $8,000 · EducationDel Valle Isd Edu…ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND: $17,500 · Health
Other$399,550Youth Development$200,000Education$110,250Health$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $200,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLEANDER EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetDRIPPING SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLake Travis Education Foundation: $18,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION COMMUNITY FUND: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAustin Community College Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBastrop Education Foundation: $12,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $11,250 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetDel Valle Isd Education Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Constructors Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Constructors Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Constructors Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to American Constructors Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Constructors’ filings →

    More from the funding graph