Skip to content

· Public charity

American Center for International Labor Solidarity

To empower workers to raise their voice for dignity on the job, justice in their communities and greater equality in the global economy.

$7.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$612k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$3.7MCivil Rights$1.5MEducation$612kInternational$525kHealth$231kCrime & Legal$45k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,591,716, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,540,715 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,948,999 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $919k
  • $250k+1 grant · $612k
$115,650
Median grant
4
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST WEST MANAGEMENT INTSTITUTE INC (EWMI)$612,195
CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION (CPA)$231,215
UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT$191,143
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT FOR PROFIT LAW (ICNL)$155,749
WORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM$115,650
GLOBAL LABOR JUSTICE-INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM$101,321
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF CONTRAC$69,680
GLOBAL LABOR JUSTICE-INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM$53,885
INTERNATIONAL FEMALE LAWYERS AND ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION INC (IFLAA)$34,890
CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC (CDM)$25,988
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $191k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $6.1M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.8M · 30% · 34 grants

Stated purpose: STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITY OF BURMESE UNIONS TO REPRESENT WORKER INTERESTS AND ADVOCATE FOR ADHERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS · LMPROVED ABILITY OF WORKERS TO ENGAGE IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE WORKPLACE · STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITY OF AND DEMOCRACY WITHIN FSPM TO REINFORCE RESILIENCY AND MORE EFFECTIVELY REPRESENT WORKER INTERESTS AT THE WORKPLACE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$947k · 16% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: PROMOTING FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND INDEPENDENT MEDIA · FORCED LABOR (EUFL) COALITION AND THE COALITION STEERING COMMITTEE, AND TO ADVANCE THE ISSUE OF UYGHUR FORCED LABOUR AND BRING LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CHANGES AT THE GOVERNMENTAL AND INSTITUTIONAL LEVEL. · IMPROVE THE ABILITY AND RESILIENCY OF BELARUSIAN UNIONS AND WORKER ORGANIZATIONS TO DEFEND WORKER RIGHTS, PROTECT ACTIVISTS AGAINST REGIME REPRESSION, AND MAINTAIN A WORKER VOICE DESPITE ADVERSE CONDITIONS

South America$894k · 15% · 18 grants

Stated purpose: CREATE UNION POWER BY INCREASING MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS AND ADVOCATING FOR IMPROVED PROTECTIONS FOR DOMESTIC WORKERS IN BRAZIL. · BUILD THE COLLECTIVE POWER OF UNDERREPRESENTED WORKERS IN UNION AND PUBLIC POLICY SPACES IN THE CONTEXT OF A CHANGING WORLD OF WORK IN BRAZI · STRENGTHEN THE COLLECTIVE AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY OF DOMESTIC WORKERS AND DOMESTIC WORKER UNION LEADERS TO ENGAGE IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF DOMESTIC WORKER RIGHTS IN THE LATIN AMERICA REGION

Russia and Neighboring States$787k · 13% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: IMPROVE PROCESSES FOR WOMEN TO ACCESS QUALITY EMPLOYMENT. · BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THE PARTNER AND ITS AFFILIATES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR TO PROTECT FUNDAMENTAL LABOR RIGHTS, FOSTER ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS, PROMOTE GENDER EQUALITY, AND CONDUCT SOCIAL POLICY ADVOCACY. · SUSTAIN UNION CAPACITY TO ADVOCATE FOR WORKERS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND IMPROVE CONDITIONS FOR WORKING PEOPLE IN EURASIA.

Central America and the Caribbean$564k · 9% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: PROMOTING RESPECT FOR WORKER RIGHTS THROUGH DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS · PROMOTE A CULTURE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR RIGHTS FOR AGRICULTURE SECTOR WORKERS THROUGH WORKER OUTREACH, LABOR RIGHTS EDUCATION, ORGANIZATION STRENGTHENING AND ADVOCACY ENGAGEMENT. · SUPPORT FOR CENTRAL AMERICAN UNIONS IN THE BANANA, PINEAPPLE, AND AGRICULTURE SECTOR

North America (Canada and Mexico)$378k · 6% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: STRENGTHENING THE CENTER FOR ASSISTANCE, ADVICE AND CARE FOR TEMPORARY MIGRANT WORKERS (CAAATM), CARE FOR TEMPORARY MIGRANT WORKERS (CAAATM), AND THE CENTER FOR ACCOMPANIMENT AND ORGANIZATION · BUILDING AN INDEPENDENT AND DEMOCRATIC LABOR MOVEMENT TO PROTECT WORKER RIGHTS IN MEXICO (PHASE 1) · DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LABOR PRACTICES AND POLICIES OBSERVATORY

South Asia$303k · 5% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: IMPROVED EFFECTIVENESS OF WORKER ORGANIZATIONS TO TRAIN, REPRESENT, AND ADVOCATE FOR WORKERS IN TARGET WORKPLACES AND COMMUNITIES. · IMPROVE CONDITIONS FOR WORKERS IN TWO CRITICALLY IMPORTANT EMPLOYMENT SECTORS IN BANGLADESH: READYMADE GARMENTS · PROMOTE IMPROVED RESPECT FOR INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS, INCLUDING FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, IN THE PAKISTANI BRICK KILN AND GARMENT/TEXTILE SECTORS.

Sub-Saharan Africa$291k · 5% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: STRENGTHEN TRADE UNIONS ORGANIZING CAPACITY AND ENHANCE INCLUSIVE SYSTEMS FOR SAFE AND MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN · BOLSTER CLVLC PARTICLPATLON OF TRADE UNLONS, CLVLL SOCLETY, WOMEN, AND YOUTH IN THE LNFORMAL ECONOMY IN POLLCY AND LEGISLATLVE ADVOCACY AND ACCOUNTABILITY. · IN COOPERATION WITH THE CSO ALLIANCE, MCTU WILL ADVOCATE FOR THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SADC PROTOCOL ON GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT IN MALAWI.

Middle East and North Africa$70k · 1% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITY OF MARGINALIZED WORKERS (PARTICULARLY WOMEN, MIGRANTS, AND YOUTH) TO DEFEND AND ADVOCATE FOR THEIR RIGHTS. · BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF WORKERS AND TRADE UNIONISTS TO STRENGTHEN THE LABOR MOVEMENT · LEGAL ADVICE PROVIDED BY IN-HOUSE LAWYER TO WORKERS AND UNIONS ON THE LABOR LAW.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 11 repeat orgs$493k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$6.2M
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+57%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalCivil RightsEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EAST-WEST MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $701k · revenue +118%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $426k · revenue +43%
  • CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $347k · revenue +236%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE ENTERPRISE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $65k · revenue +16%
  • FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +57%
  • CL
    CHINA LABOR WATCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +220%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
2
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
3
The International Refugee Rights Initiative

To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…

—
4
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
5
Women's Link Worldwide

A legal organization working to advance the rights of women, girls, and gender diverse people. We work on issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, climate, and racial justice in East Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the…

Civil Rights
6
Center for Justice and International Law

To contribute to the full enjoyment of human rights in the americas through effective use of the tools of the inter-american system and international human rights law

Crime & Legal
7
Ipc International Inc

Ipc is a global trade association dedicated to furthering the competitive excellence and financial success of its members, who are participants in the electronics industry. in pursuit of these objectives, ipc will devote resources to…

—
8
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
9
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
10
Global Justice Center

Global justice center is a legal human rights organization that uses international law to achieve gender equality and dismantle systems of oppression.

Civil Rights
11
International Women's Democracy Center

Iwdc was established to strengthen women's global leadership through training, education, networking and research with a focus on increasing the participation of women in politics, policy and decision making within their own communities.

International
12
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center for International Private Enterprise Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAST WEST MANAGEMENT INTSTITUTE INC (EWMI): $1,459,989 · OtherEAST WEST MANAGEMENT INTSTITUTE INC (EWMI)CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE ENTERPRISE - CIPE: $894,844 · OtherCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE ENTERPRISE - CIPEASIA INJURY PREVENTION FOUNDATION INC (AIP): $574,218 · OtherASIA INJURY PREVENTION FOUNDATION INC (AIP)REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $508,596 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIATHE WORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM - (WRC): $387,280 · OtherTHE WORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM - (WRC)INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT FOR PROFIT LAW (ICNL): $287,887 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT FOR PROFIT LAW (ICNL)+2 more: $36,521 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC: $425,663 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM: $155,206 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN: $138,691 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE ENTERPRISE INC: $65,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR IN…INTERNATIONAL FEMALE LAWYERS AND ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION INC: $34,890 · InternationalEAST-WEST MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE INC: $700,882 · EducationEAST-WEST M…WORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM INC: $481,755 · Civil Rights+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $347,155 · HealthUYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $191,143 · Human Services
Other$4,149,335International$819,450Education$700,882Civil Rights$491,755Health$347,155Human Services$191,143

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST-WEST MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE INC: $700,882 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM INC: $481,755 over 2y, 12% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC: $425,663 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $347,155 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetUYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $191,143 over 1y, 22% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM: $155,206 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN: $138,691 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE ENTERPRISE INC: $65,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FEMALE LAWYERS AND ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION INC: $34,890 over 1y, 48% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $25,988 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $10,533 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHINA LABOR WATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation to Promote Open SocietyNY17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · National Endowment for Democracy · Open Society Institute · The Ford Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · New Venture Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Center for International Labor Solidarity funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Center for International Labor Solidarity. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Center for International Labor Solidarity’s filings →

More from the funding graph