Skip to content
American Business Immigration Coalition at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

American Business Immigration Coalition

To promote sensible immigration reform that supports the economy of the united states, provides american companies with both the high-skilled and low-skilled talent they need, and allows the integration of immigrants into our economy as consumers, workers, entrepreneurs, and citizens.

$298k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.5MCivil Rights$250kCrime & Legal$14kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $215k
$41,890
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$110,297
MELROSE PARK CCCD$104,374
POSITIVE REFLECTIONS$41,890
INVEST AURORA$23,040
NATIVE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$16,378
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Foundation for a Globally Competitive Texas: $25k → 10%NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $50k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES LEGAL SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $14k → 15%FLORIDA PEOPLE'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 19%DOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $111k → 7%INVEST AURORA: $23k → 8%MELROSE PARK CCCD: $282k → 14%The Wright Way: $65k → 15%Maine Business Immigration Coalition: $50k → 7%DOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $110k → 7%INVEST AURORA: $16k → 8%Melrose Park Chamber of Commerce: $226k → 14%The Wright Way: $41k → 15%Maine Business Immigration Coalition: $30k → 7%Native American Chamber of Commerce: $41k → 7%Melrose Park Chamber of Commerce: $130k → 14%POSITIVE REFLECTIONS: $78k → 15%Native American Chamber of Commerce: $37k → 7%MELROSE PARK CCCD: $104k → 14%POSITIVE REFLECTIONS: $42k → 15%UNITED AFRICAN ORGANIZATION: $20k → 14%HANA CENTER DBA KOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%Austin Chamber of Commerce: $70k → 14%Austin Chamber of Commerce: $22k → 14%LATINO POLICY FORUM: $35k → 14%SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 8 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$1.5M
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+82%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementCivil RightsEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MELROSE PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NFP
    4× · 2021–2024 · $743k · revenue +68% · 97% of their budget
  • DG
    DOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $222k · revenue +6%
  • ST
    SEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $39k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • NG
    NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • LP
    LATINO POLICY FORUM
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +15%
  • FF
    Foundation for a Globally Competitive Texasgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +115%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cook County Chamber
Philanthropy
2
Mexican American Chamber of Commerc

A strong advocate for business issues. the chamber also provides technical and general assistance to entrepreneurs to be competitive in today's economy.

—
3
Urban Chamber of Commerce

Create nbsp;an nbsp;innovative nbsp;entreprenuerial nbsp;space nbsp;to nbsp;promote nbsp;local nbsp;and nbsp;global nbsp;business

Community Improvement
4
Latin American Chamber of Commerce

To foster relationships between hispanic and non-hispanic business, associations, individuals and goverment to create new business opportunities

Community Improvement
5
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
6
Logan Square Chamber of Commerce

Over 150 business members in Logan Square Area served through technical assistance, events, marketing and advocacy opportunities and services through the Chamber of Commerce.

Community Improvement
7
Greater Dallas Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

To grow and support the hispanic business community in north texas.

Community Improvement
8
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
9
Austin Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote the economic, civil, industrial and cultural growth of austin, minnesota and the surrounding area.

—
10
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
11
Latino Business Chamber of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Economic development of the latino community

Community Improvement
12
Illinois Chamber of Commerce

The unifying leader of policies that support growth in illinois' dynamic and diverse economy. this is done through various means, one of which is aggressively advocate the interest of business. its vision is a vibrant and prosperous future…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Policy Forum; the most unlike its peers is Downers Grove Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MELROSE PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NFP: $742,574 · Community ImprovementMELROSE PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NFPDOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $221,535 · Community ImprovementDOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONAUSTIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $91,961 · Community ImprovementAUSTIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCESEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $39,213 · Community ImprovementNATIVE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF ILLINOIS: $125,347 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE …POSITIVE REFLECTIONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION: $119,930 · OtherPOSITIVE REFLECTIONS COMMUNITY OUTRE…The Wright Way: $105,970 · OtherThe Wright WayMAINE BUSINESS IMMIGRATION COALITION: $80,000 · OtherMAINE BUSINESS IMMIGRATION COALITIONNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATIONLATINO POLICY FORUM: $35,000 · OtherLATINO POLICY FORUMHANA CENTER DBA KOREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $24,394 · OtherSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $20,000 · Civil RightsUNITED AFRICAN ORGANIZATION: $20,000 · Civil RightsFoundation for a Globally Competitive Texas: $25,000 · EducationFlorida Center For Fiscal and Econo: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Community Improvement$1,095,283Other$560,641Civil Rights$40,000Education$25,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMELROSE PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NFP: $742,574 over 4y, 97% of budgetDOWNERS GROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $221,535 over 2y, 16% of budgetAUSTIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $91,961 over 2y, 82% of budgetSEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $39,213 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLATINO POLICY FORUM: $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFoundation for a Globally Competitive Texas: $25,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED AFRICAN ORGANIZATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCatholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc: $14,394 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFlorida Center For Fiscal and Econo: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Business Immigration Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Business Immigration Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Business Immigration Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home