· Public charity
American Association of School Administrators Inc
AASA, The School Superintendents Association advocates for equitable access for all students to the highest quality public education, and develops and supports school system leaders.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $50,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $70,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE GAULT CENTER | $30,000 |
| COLLABORATIVE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABUCKEYE ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +33%
- MAMICHIGAN ASSOC OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +53%
- FAFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- NSNATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -6%
AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +75%- BCBURNESS COMMUNICATIONS INCone grant, 2023 · $120k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AASA, The School Superintendents Association advocates for equitable access for all students to the highest quality public education, and develops and supports school system leaders.
Connect our members - texas school business and operations professionals - to relevant training and a supportive community so they can stay ahead and find belonging in their careers.
Support state cte leadership to advance high-quality and equitable cte policies, programs and pathways that ensure career and college success for each learner.
Milwaukee public school administrators and supervisors council inc. was formed in 1971 to serve as the exclusive bargaining agent for its membership, via collection of dues as the primary source of revenue.
Education
To promote the instruction and training of school administrators for the improvement and advancement of educational and public interest in schools.
Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
To elevate the profession of teaching, to secure effective cooperation of all agencies for improving schools, and to promote the advancement of the educator professionally, economically, and socially.
Served hsta members as their exclusive collective bargaining agent,administered members' contract negotiations with the state of hawaiiconcerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, fringe benefits, hoursand other employment conditions.
Advance education at all levels by providing its members and the general public with information regarding management, organization, and coordination of school administration.
Unite, organize and empower public education advocates to shape public education in texas thus providing a quality public school for every child.
Promoting the practice and profession of statistics.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afterschool Alliance and the most unlike its peers is National League of Cities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES ↗
- Who funds THE GAULT CENTER ↗
- Who funds BUCKEYE ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ASSOC OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE ORGANIZATION OF SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENTS ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINSTRATORS ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Association of School Administrators Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.