Skip to content

· Public charity

American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter

Promote health for vt children

$648k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$1.2M
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $513,371, the rows itemized in this filing. The $647,786 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $134,415 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $331k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$363k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRIMARY CARE HEALTH PARTNERS$60,700
COMMUNITY HEALTH RUTLAND$54,000
LAMOILLE HEALTH PARTNERS$40,000
LITTLE RIVERS HEALTH$30,000
NORTH STAR HEALTH$30,000
MONARCH MAPLE PEDIATRICS$20,000
EVERGREEN FAMILY HEALTH$20,000
ROCKINGHAM HEALTH CENTER$20,000
SOUTH ROYALTON HEALTH CENTER$18,228
NVRH KINGDOM INTERNAL MEDICINE$13,000
GREEN MOUNTAIN PRIMARY CARE$10,000
PARK STREET HEALTHCARE$10,000
MOUNTAIN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER$10,000
ALL BRAINS BELONG VT$10,000
NATURAL FAMILY HEALTH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ALL BRAINS BELONG VT: $10k → 9%ALL BRAINS BELONG VT: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$929k · 23 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$929k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+19%

Still filing today

35%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $114k · revenue +20%
  • LH
    Lamoille Health Partners Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF THE RUTLAND REGION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $97k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF BURLINGTON INC
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue -4%
  • RH
    RICHFORD HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Counties Health Care Inc

Mission: To provide high-quality, accessible, patient-centered health care. Vision: NCHC is a key partner in building healthy families and thriving communities. Values: We pursue quality in all that we do and are committed to: Mutual…

Health
2
Central Vermont Home Health & Hospice Inc

Provide comprehensive, high quality home health and hospice care to all Central Vermonters, regardless of their ability to pay. In addition, the agency promotes the general welfare of the citizens of Central Vermont with health promotion…

Human Services
3
Sacopee Valley Health Center

To provide accessible, comprehensive healthcare tailored to meet the needs of each individual and the community we serve.

Health
4
Brattleboro Retreat

Inspired by the courage of our patients, the Brattleboro Retreat is dedicated to children, adolescents and adults in their pursuit of recovery from mental illness and psychological trauma. We are committed to excellence in treatment,…

Health
5
Battenkill Valley Health Center Inc

Battenkill Valley Health Center provides compassionate, comprehensive, affordable healthcare.

Health
6
White Mountain Community Health Center

White Mountain Community Health Center provides the community with affordable access to high-quality, compassionate, individualized healthcare and support services needed to achieve wellness.

Health
7
Houlton Regional Hospital

Houlton Regional Hospital's purpose is to provide safe, compassionate, quality, cost effective care to communities we serve. We are dedicated to improving the health status of those we support through education, treatment and…

Health
8
Bi-State Primary Care Association Inc

Advance access to comprehensive primary care services for all, with special emphasis on those most in need in Vermont and New Hampshire.

Health
9
Gifford Health Care Inc

The mission of Gifford Health Care, Inc. and its subsidiaries is to enhance the health and well-being of our communities by providing excellent patient-centered care including senior living services.

Health
10
Lamoille Home Health Agency Inc

To support health, independence & dignity through quality care in the home.

—
11
Valley Regional Healthcare Inc

Valley Regional Healthcare, Inc. is organized to coordinate and support the activities of health care organizations, including Valley Regional Hospital, Inc.

Health
12
Lake Sunapee Home Care and Hospice

Lake Sunapee Region VNA & Hospice provides health care and hospice services for individuals and families in homes and community settings, fostering continuity of care across settings and enabling people to stay in their homes as long as…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc; the most unlike its peers is The University of Vermont Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRIMARY CARE HEALTH PARTNERS: $126,939 · OtherPRIMARY CARE HEALTH PARTNERSPRIMARY CARE HEALTH PARTNERS: $60,700 · OtherPRIMARY CARE HEALTH PARTNERSMONARCH MAPLE PEDIATRICS: $40,000 · OtherMONARCH MAPLE PEDIATRICSEVERGREEN FAMILY HEALTH: $40,000 · OtherEVERGREEN FAMILY HEALTHPETER AND LISA HOGENKAMP PC: $30,000 · OtherVILLAGE HEALTH INC: $30,000 · OtherTREE OF LIFE MEDICINE: $28,738 · OtherSOUTH ROYALTON HEALTH CENTER: $28,228 · OtherPEDIATRIC MEDICINE: $27,380 · Other+12 more: $193,141 · Other+12 moreSpringfield Medical Care Systems Inc: $113,660 · HealthSpringfield Medical Care Systems IncLamoille Health Partners Inc: $100,000 · HealthLamoille Health Partners IncCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF THE RUTLAND REGION: $97,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF THE RUTLAND REGIONCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF BURLINGTON INC: $70,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF BURLINGTON INCLittle Rivers Health Care Inc: $60,000 · HealthLittle Rivers Health Care IncGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $23,138 · HealthNortheastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc: $21,500 · HealthAddison County Home Health Hospice Inc: $20,000 · Health+4 more: $37,148 · Health+4 moreALL BRAINS BELONG VT INC: $18,245 · Human Services
Other$605,126Health$542,446Human Services$18,245

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSpringfield Medical Care Systems Inc: $113,660 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLamoille Health Partners Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF THE RUTLAND REGION: $97,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF BURLINGTON INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLittle Rivers Health Care Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $23,138 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNortheastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc: $21,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAddison County Home Health Hospice Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL BRAINS BELONG VT INC: $18,245 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBrattleboro Memorial Hospital: $13,665 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRICHFORD HEALTH CENTER INC: $11,236 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern Medical Center: $7,726 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNortheastern Vermont Regional Corp: $5,757 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lamoille Health Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF THE RUTLAND REGION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF BURLINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Rivers Health Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds Good Neighbor Health Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc ↗
  • Who funds Addison County Home Health Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALL BRAINS BELONG VT INC ↗
  • Who funds Brattleboro Memorial Hospital ↗
  • Who funds RICHFORD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Northeastern Vermont Regional Corp ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT21.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Bi-State Primary Care Association Inc · Kinney Drugs Foundation Inc · Northeast Delta Dental Foundation · Center for Health and Learning Ltd · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Richford Health Center Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Lamoille Health Partners Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Community Health Centers of Burlington Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Little Rivers Health Care Inc: 15% of income from government
  • All Brains Belong Vt Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Community Health Centers of the Rutland Region: 5% of income from government
  • Addison County Home Health Hospice Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Memorial Hospital: 1% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center: 1% of income from government
  • Northwestern Medical Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter?

Find your warmest path to American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter’s filings →

More from the funding graph