Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ambrosiani-Pastore Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$395kEducation$279kHousing & Shelter$81kEmployment$40kHuman Services$40kReligion$35kHealth$25kYouth Development$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$14,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$30,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$20,000
PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS$15,000
LAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT$14,400
THE FILLING STATION$12,000
Immaculate Heart Retreat Center$10,000
BONNER COUNTY GOSPEL MISSION$10,000
SISTERS OF MARY MOTHER OF THE CHURC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $15k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $15k → 12%PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS: $10k → 12%UNDERGROUND KINDNESS: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$439k · 6 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$439k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+40%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $196k
  • CU
    Creighton University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +18%
  • BC
    BONNER COUNTY HOMELESS TASK FORCE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $66k · revenue -33%

Funded once

  • BR
    BOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +40%
  • LC
    LIONS CLUB - TOYS FOR TOTS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • PR
    PRIEST RIVER MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Idaho Panhandle Habitat for Humanity Inc

To provide affordable housing for low-income families.

—
3
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
4
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
5
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
6
Bonner Community Housing Agency Inc

Our mission is to produce creative solutions, develop quality affordable housing and assist those making the Average Median Income fulfill their housing needs and goals.

Housing & Shelter
7
Bonner General Hospital Inc

To provide excellence in healthcare

Health
8
Habitat for Humanity - Idaho Falls Area Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope.

—
9
Bonner General Hospital Foundation Inc

The Bonner General Health Foundation is committed to advancing the promise to change and save lives through philanthropy by developing resources and creating awareness that helps expand the trust the community has in Bonner General Health.

Health
10
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
11
The Housing Company

To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…

Unclassified
12
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boundary Regional Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Underground Kindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $395,000 · PhilanthropyIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCLAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $195,695 · OtherLAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICTFILLING STATION INC: $37,000 · OtherFILLING STATION INCSISTERS OF MARY MOTHER OF THE CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherSISTERS OF MARY MOTHER OF THE CHURCHBONNER COUNTY GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 · OtherIMMACULATE HEART RETREAT CENTER: $10,000 · OtherLIONS CLUB - TOYS FOR TOTS: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherCreighton University: $80,000 · EducationCreighton …Panhandle Alliance for Education: $3,250 · EducationBONNER COUNTY HOMELESS TASK FORCE: $66,000 · Housing & ShelterPANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesUnderground Kindness Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesBOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $25,000 · Health
Philanthropy$395,000Other$292,695Education$83,250Housing & Shelter$66,000Human Services$42,500Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $395,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCreighton University: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBONNER COUNTY HOMELESS TASK FORCE: $66,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetPANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BONNER GOSPEL MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPanhandle Alliance for Education: $3,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUnderground Kindness Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds BONNER COUNTY HOMELESS TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE SPECIAL NEEDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BONNER GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Panhandle Alliance for Education ↗
  • Who funds Underground Kindness Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Innovia Foundation · Equinox Foundation Inc · The Avista Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ambrosiani-Pastore Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ambrosiani-Pastore Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ambrosiani-Pastore Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ambrosiani-Pastore Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ambrosiani-Pastore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph