Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ambassador Saving Grace Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$130kEducation$80kHuman Services$23kReligion$22kAnimals$21kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRI COUNTY ANIMAL RESCUE$12,200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
DAUGHTERS OF AMERICAN REV$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
NY
IA
OH
CA
AR
DC
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$236k · 9 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$236k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+18%

Still filing today

44%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $95k · revenue +49%
  • RW
    RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRYMEN OF ST MATTHEWS PARISH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k

Funded once

  • PB
    PALM BEACH HEART ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • SM
    ST MARKS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
3
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
4
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
5
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
6
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
7
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
8
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
9
Humane Society of Manatee County

The humane society of manatee county leads the community in fostering compassion and respect for animals through quality care, education, and advocacy to improve the lives of animals and strengthen the human-animal bond.

Animals
10
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
11
Hawaiian Humane Society

The hawaiian humane society works to improve the welfare of animals through animal care, education, legislation, and prevention on the island of oahu. its mission is to promote the human-animal bond and the humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
12
Charleston Animal Society

Since its founding, our mission has always stayed the same: the prevention of cruelty to animals. in 1874, charleston animal society became the first animal organization in south carolina and one of the first in the nation and has never…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Children's Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRYMEN OF ST MATTHEWS PARISH — $50,000 · OtherRECTOR WARDENS & VESTRYMEN OF ST MATTHEWS PARISHIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $17,223 · OtherWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOUNDATIONPALM BEACH HEART ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · OtherPALM BEACH HEART ASSOCIATIONST MARKS — $15,000 · OtherST MARKSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEKENTER CANYON PARENT CENTER — $9,800 · OtherEPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE ANNUAL FUND — $7,500 · Other+11 more — $31,400 · Other+11 moreARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $95,000 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITALSt Helena Hospital Foundation — $10,000 · HealthSt Helena Hospital FoundationFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INCTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $17,200 · AnimalsWILDLIFE MISSISSIPPI — $2,000 · Animals+1 more — $500 · AnimalsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $3,000 · Human ServicesMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC — $250 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS — $2,000 · InternationalTHE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,600 · EducationRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOWSTONE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY — $1,000 · Environment
Other$185,923Health$115,000Animals$19,700Human Services$3,250International$2,000Education$1,600Arts & Culture$1,000Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $17,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILDLIFE MISSISSIPPI — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds St Helena Hospital Foundation
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds JUNIOR AUXILIARY OF GREENVILLE INC
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS
  • Who funds WILDLIFE MISSISSIPPI
  • Who funds THE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ambassador Saving Grace Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ambassador Saving Grace Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ambassador Saving Grace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph