Skip to content

· Private foundation

Amato Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$141kEducation$86kPhilanthropy$48kHealth$32kRecreation & Sports$26kEmployment$20kArts & Culture$4kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$350
Median grant
7
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Journey 21$22,000
Saint Joseph Peruvian Mission Fund$17,500
MATC Foundation$10,000
Oconomowoc Area Foundation$5,000
Summit 54$5,000
WATDA Foundation$5,000
Create Wisconsin$2,500
The Shelter for Abused Women Childr$1,200
Impact 100 Milwaukee$1,100
St John Vianney Church$460
Kettle Moraine Garden Club$405
Individual grant recipient$350
Basilica of St Josaphat$300
Ronald McDonald House$250
Stars and Stripes Honor Flight$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Pregnancy Center Plus: $100 → 16%Christian Appalachian Project: $100 → 26%Oconomowoc Womens Club: $65 → 5%Italian Community Center: $100 → 17%Pathfinders Milwaukee: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$301k · 24 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
46

Total granted

$301k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +17%
  • OL
    OKAUCHEE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +847%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MA
    Milwaukee Area Technical College Fo
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • SC
    St Catherine of Alexandra Parish
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NJ
    NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
3
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
4
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
5
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education
6
Wisconsin Technical College System Foundation Inc

The wisconsin technical college system (wtcs) foundation, inc., seeks to advance the wisconsin technical college system, its constituent technical colleges and public and private sector career, technical and workplace education. the…

Education
7
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
8
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
9
Wisconsin Technology Innovation Initiative Inc

Support, promote, and facilitate partnerships with and provide funding for innovative early-stage and startup companies to lessen the burdens of government by promoting economic development and creating sustaining jobs in wisconsin.

—
10
Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce Inc

Founded in 1911, our mission is to make wisconsin the most competitive state in the nation to do business. we are wisconsin's business voice.

—
11
The Wausaukee Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters

To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
17/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Saint Joseph Peruvian Mission Fund: $21,500 · OtherSaint Joseph Peruvian Mission FundSt Catherine's: $21,450 · OtherSt Catherine'sMilwaukee Area Technical College Fo: $20,000 · OtherMilwaukee Area Technical College FoWATDA: $17,000 · OtherWATDAST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $13,710 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCHImpact 100 Milwaukee: $8,860 · OtherImpact 100 MilwaukeeSt Catherine of Alexandra Parish: $5,000 · OtherNATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · Other+59 more: $24,245 · Other+59 moreMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICA…THE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION OF THE W…SUMMIT54: $10,000 · EducationSUMMIT54+3 more: $400 · EducationST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION: $75,113 · InternationalST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN M…WAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyWAUKESHA CO…OCONOMOWOC AREA FOUNDATION INC: $12,800 · PhilanthropyOCONOMOWOC …+1 more: $300 · PhilanthropyJourney 21 Inc: $27,000 · Housing & ShelterOKAUCHEE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC: $25,850 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $100 · Recreation & SportsCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$136,765Education$80,400International$75,113Philanthropy$38,100Housing & Shelter$27,000Recreation & Sports$25,950Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION: $75,113 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJourney 21 Inc: $27,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOKAUCHEE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC: $25,850 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOCONOMOWOC AREA FOUNDATION INC: $12,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSUMMIT54: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB INC: $2,155 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE THROUGH RESTORATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN FOR MACC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD PANTRY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetI AM ALS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKemper Center Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALL PINES CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITALIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOconomowoc Food Pantry Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Journey 21 Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKAUCHEE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OCONOMOWOC AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT54 ↗
  • Who funds CREATE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds KETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THROUGH RESTORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR MACC INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD PANTRY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds STARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI28.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Emil Ewald Family Foundation Inc · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Galaxy Foundation Inc · Ellenbecker Investment Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Windhover Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amato Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amato Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amato Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph