Skip to content
Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc

The alzheimer's association leads the way to end alzheimer's and all other dementia - by accelerating global research, driving risk reduction and early detection, and maximizing quality care and support.

$91M
Granted FY2025still arriving
79
Grants FY2025still arriving
32
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$243MEducation$196MScience & Tech$13MHuman Services$3.7MCommunity Improvement$3.0MRecreation & Sports$839kArts & Culture$330kSocial Science$325kOther$0
02FY2025 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 79 grants below total $73,298,759, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,708,349 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,409,590 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $6.7M
  • $250k+40 grants · $67M
$270,750
Median grant
32
States reached
$524M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$13,288,186
ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT$10,591,004
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES$5,950,824
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$5,232,009
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (USC)$3,183,783
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER$2,409,454
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$1,622,612
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$1,615,897
MASSACHUESETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,281,849
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$1,192,257
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$1,184,350
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$1,180,000
BROAD INSTITUTE (ELI AND EDYTHE L BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD )$1,091,925
AINYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HSC$997,697
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROAD INSTITUTE INC: $3.1M → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC: $1.6M → 16%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $1.3M → 10%The Research Foundation of SUNY: $2.0M → 7%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $2.6M → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $1.5M → 16%Longeveron LLC: $3.0M → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $13.3M → 21%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $2.2M → 18%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $3.6M → 6%BROAD INSTITUTE INC: $2.2M → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $5.3M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $3.8M → 14%THE METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2.4M → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $7.1M → 11%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $2.0M → 18%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $1.5M → 6%Cyclerion Therapeutics Inc: $2.0M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $3.3M → 14%The University of Texas Health Science Center at S: $2.0M → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN STLOUIS: $3.4M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (USC): $3.2M → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN STLOUIS: $2.7M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2.9M → 14%SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGING: $1.4M → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $2.6M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2.5M → 14%AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 11%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $1.6M → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $2.3M → 8%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $1.9M → 8%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER: $2.4M → 17%Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc at Ne: $1.8M → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $1.7M → 17%ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $10.6M → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $1.3M → 17%ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $10.1M → 14%ALZHEIMERS IMPACT MOVEMENT: $10.0M → 14%ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $9.9M → 14%Alzheimer's Impact Movement: $7.1M → 14%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1.6M → 16%ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $6.6M → 14%MASSACHUESETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1.3M → 16%Alzheimers Impact Movement: $6.5M → 14%Alzheimer's Impact Movement: $6.0M → 14%ALZHEIMERS IMPACT MOVEMENT: $1.4M → 14%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1.6M → 17%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1.3M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $17M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$10.0M · 60% · 26 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

South America$2.9M · 18% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

East Asia and the Pacific$1.9M · 12% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

Middle East and North Africa$572k · 3% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$494k · 3% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

Central America and the Caribbean$406k · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

Sub-Saharan Africa$125k · 1% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

South Asia$75k · 0% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374M · 119 repeat orgs$36M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

119 repeat relationships: 57 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119
110

Total granted

$374M
$31M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+18%

Still filing today

40%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureScience & TechRecreation & SportsSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68M · revenue +467% · 96% of their budget
  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43M · revenue +78%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36M · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • LL
    Longeveron LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $3.0M
  • CT
    Cyclerion Therapeutics Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M
  • QI
    QINOTTO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
12
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is The Tank Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 253 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
123/125
Grantees still filing
105/125
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $42,908,577 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $35,855,642 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $23,882,135 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $9,196,204 · EducationNew York University: $7,668,708 · Education+44 more: $56,426,408 · Education+44 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $19,704,556 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $10,932,176 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIndiana University School of Medicine: $8,916,260 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $6,304,283 · Other+108 more: $112,813,026 · Other+108 moreALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $68,184,045 · HealthALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENTAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $8,702,251 · HealthAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGYThe Broad Institute Inc: $7,861,695 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc: $4,563,953 · Health+29 more: $27,923,646 · Health+29 moreNorthwestern University: $1,486,259 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,424,929 · Community ImprovementThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $1,075,000 · Science & TechHUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY: $199,361 · Science & TechBUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $325,000 · Social ScienceIDEAS INSTITUTE: $230,488 · Environment
Education$175,937,674Other$158,670,301Health$117,235,590Recreation & Sports$1,486,259Community Improvement$1,424,929Science & Tech$1,274,361Social Science$325,000Environment$230,488

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT: $68,184,045 over 9y, 96% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $42,908,577 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $35,855,642 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $23,882,135 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $9,196,204 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $8,702,251 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $7,861,695 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNew York University: $7,668,708 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,528,793 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $5,431,007 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,009,790 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc: $4,563,953 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $3,828,356 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,820,737 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $3,380,980 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYale University: $3,260,570 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $3,088,613 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $3,038,716 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBanner Alzheimer's Foundation: $3,000,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $2,926,385 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $2,758,353 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $2,724,027 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,581,760 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,349,691 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $2,319,781 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,140,539 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $2,122,068 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,920,834 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $1,868,366 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $1,831,160 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $1,805,162 over 5y, 26% of budgetVanderbilt University: $1,562,339 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,486,259 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,424,929 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,176,307 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $1,075,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $1,044,103 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $949,997 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $846,932 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $774,645 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $724,974 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCornell University: $650,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $625,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $530,364 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $525,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $523,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY CENTER FOR VETERANS RESEARCH: $504,082 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetMENORAH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED AND INFIRM: $474,531 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds Banner Alzheimer's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Trustees of Colum…American Heart Associ…University of Pittsbu…Mayo ClinicWashington UniversityYale UniversityVanderbilt University…Cornell UniversityTrustees of Boston Un…University of Souther…Emory UniversityJohns Hopkins Univers…
The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New YorkNY57.4× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · American Heart Association Inc · University of Pittsburgh · Mayo Clinic · Washington University · Yale University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Cornell University · Trustees of Boston University · University of Southern California · Emory University · Johns Hopkins University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 253 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home