Skip to content
Alvis Amble Charitable Trust Ua Dtd at a glance

· Private foundation

Alvis Amble Charitable Trust Ua Dtd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$2,254
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UND Alumni Association and Foundation$26,298
Walle Evangelical Lutheran Cemetery$15,028
Valley Senior Living Foundation$2,254
The Salvation Army$2,254
United Way of Grand Forks EGF Area$2,254
Special Olympics North Dakota Inc$2,254
American National Red Cross$2,254
Greater GF Senior Citizens Assn Inc$2,254
Cvic$2,254
Grand Forks Park District$2,254
Alzheimer's Disease & Related$2,254
Circle of Friends Animal Shelter$2,254
Hospice of The Red River Valley$2,254
North Dakota Assn for Disabled Inc$2,254
Grand Forks County Historical Society$2,254
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American National Red Cross: $2k → 14%Hospice of The Red River Valley: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
2
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
3
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
4
Nd Association of Counties

NDACo provides leadership and services to foster effective and efficient government for the good of all counties.

—
5
North Dakota Soybean Growers Association

Support Policy that benefits North Dakota Soybean growers through farmer-led advocacy and partnerships.

—
6
North Dakota Long Term Care Association

We are a professional association of long term care and community service providers who enhance the lives of people we serve through collaboration, education and advocacy.

—
7
Odd Fellows and Rebekah Home of North Dakota Inc

It is the mission of the Odd Fellows Home to be a "Place Where Somebody Cares." This has been the motto off Odd Fellows Home since the 1925 dedication. The Odd Fellows Home's mission is to provide a comfortable and pleasant atmosphere as…

Housing & Shelter
8
Valley Senior Living

Valley Senior Living provides compassionate care and service from a Christian perspective to enhance the quality of life for those we serve.

Education
9
Delta Dental of South Dakota

Delta Dental of South Dakota is dedicated to advancing and promoting the improvement of oral health.

—
10
Northern State University Foundation

The Northern State University Foundation is dedicated to securing the future of Northern State University. Its purpose is to solicit and administer funds and to pursue other activities to advance this goal.

—
11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
Lutheran Home of the Good Shepherd Inc

The mission of the Lutheran Home of the Good Shepherd shall be to provide, in the name of Christ, high-quality long-term care and other services and programs which address the needs of the senior citizen and special needs individual.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Goodwill Nd Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gf County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Walle Evangelical Lutheran Cemetery: $15,028 · OtherWalle Evangelical Lutheran CemeteryUnited Way of Grand Forks EGF Area: $2,254 · OtherUnited Way of Grand Forks EGF AreaGrand Forks Park District: $2,254 · OtherGrand Forks Park DistrictTHE SALVATION ARMY: $2,254 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCircle of Friends Animal Shelter: $2,254 · OtherCircle of Friends Animal ShelterNorth Dakota Assn for Disabled Inc: $2,254 · OtherNorth Dakota Assn for Disabled IncCvic: $2,254 · OtherCvicPrairie Harvest Mental Health Fdn: $2,254 · OtherPrairie Harvest Mental Health FdnGreater GF Senior Citizens Assn Inc: $2,254 · OtherGreater GF Senior Citizens Assn IncUND Alumni Association and Foundation: $26,298 · EducationUND Alumni Association and FoundationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,254 · HealthALZHEIMER'…VALLEY SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION: $2,254 · HealthVALLEY SEN…Easter Seals Goodwill ND Inc: $2,254 · HealthEaster Sea…Hospice of the Red River Valley: $2,254 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,254 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH DAKOTA INC: $2,254 · Recreation & SportsGF COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,254 · Arts & Culture
Other$33,060Education$26,298Health$6,762Human Services$4,508Recreation & Sports$2,254Arts & Culture$2,254

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION: $2,254 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals Goodwill ND Inc: $2,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myra FoundationBlue Cross Blue Shiel…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Myra FoundationND13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myra Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alvis Amble Charitable Trust Ua Dtd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alvis Amble Charitable Trust Ua Dtd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alvis Amble Charitable Trust Ua Dtd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home