Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alvin S Tilles Item Xx Testamentary Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$327kHealth$289kEducation$89kHuman Services$77kOther$406k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
$14,031
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$35,077
LEVI ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$28,062
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH$14,031
MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB$14,031
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH$14,031
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$14,031
BOST FOUNDATION$8,291
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $40k → 17%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH: $14k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $32k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $16k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $16k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $37k → 17%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH: $14k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $29k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $15k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $15k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $37k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $29k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $15k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $15k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $37k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $29k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $15k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $15k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $36k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $29k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $14k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $14k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $36k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $29k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $14k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $14k → 12%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $35k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $28k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $14k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $14k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $35k → 17%LEVI ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $28k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $14k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $14k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $34k → 17%LEVI HOSPITAL: $27k → 17%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME AND REHAB: $14k → 17%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$819k · 7 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$819k
$14k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +50%
  • BB
    B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB)
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +25%
  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $117k · revenue +516%

Funded once

  • MF
    MERCY FOUNDATION FORT SMITH
    one grant, 2017 · $14k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEVI HOSPITAL — $233,234 · OtherLEVI HOSPITALMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH — $116,548 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITHUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH — $41,914 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITHMERCY FOUNDATION FORT SMITH — $14,102 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $326,620 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH…NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $130,650 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) — $130,650 · HealthB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPI…LEVI ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $28,062 · HealthLEVI ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC — $88,736 · EducationBOST FOUNDATION INC — $77,204 · Human Services
Other$405,798Philanthropy$326,620Health$289,362Education$88,736Human Services$77,204

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $326,620 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $130,650 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) — $130,650 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH — $116,548 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC — $88,736 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBOST FOUNDATION INC — $77,204 over 9y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB)
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION FORT SMITH
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds BOST FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEVI ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alvin S Tilles Item Xx Testamentary Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph