Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allison Baske Wiese Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$10kAnimals$7kCommunity Improvement$5kHealth$3kInternational$3kEnvironment$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$761k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOUDOUN LAURELS$10,000
LOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF$10,000
MAUI STRONG HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUND$5,000
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$5,000
ARS ARTS CULTURE CENTER$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
PROJECT KNAPSACK$3,000
HEALTH WELLNESS ESSENTIALS OF HAW$3,000
STUDIOS OF KEY WEST$2,500
ARTISTS IN MIDDLEBURG$2,500
FRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY KEY WEST$2,000
LOGGERHEAD MARINE LIFE CENTER$2,000
MOTE$2,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 8% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MAUI STRONG HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUND: $5k → 9%HEALTH WELLNESS ESSENTIALS OF HAW: $3k → 15%JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%MOTE: $2k → 9%LOGGERHEAD MARINE LIFE CENTER: $2k → 11%STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $3k → 13%ARS ARTS CULTURE CENTER: $4k → 15%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE 1: $59k → 4%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE 1: $53k → 4%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE B: $49k → 4%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE B: $48k → 4%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE 1: $44k → 4%LOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF: $10k → 4%FRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS: $2k → 4%PROJECT KNAPSACK: $3k → 4%LOUDOUN LAURELS: $10k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
4
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
5
The Seattle Aquarium Society

Our mission is inspiring conservation of our marine environment.

Animals
6
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
8
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
9
Loudoun Museum Inc

Discover, Conserve, Interpret and disseminate knowledge of Loudouns Culture and History.

Arts & Culture
10
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
11
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
12
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jane Goodall Institute for Wildlife Research Education and Conservation; the most unlike its peers is Project Knapsack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAUI STRONG HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUND: $5,000 · OtherMAUI STRONG HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDARS ARTS CULTURE CENTER: $4,000 · OtherARS ARTS CULTURE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHEALTH WELLNESS ESSENTIALS OF HAW: $3,000 · OtherHEALTH WELLNESS ESSENTIALS OF HAWMOTE: $2,000 · OtherMOTEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY KEY WEST: $2,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY KEY WESTWAMU 885 FM AMER UNIV: $1,000 · OtherLOUDOUN LAURELS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLOUDOUN LAURELSARTISTS IN MIDDLEBURG: $2,500 · Arts & CultureARTISTS IN MIDDLEBURGTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WESTLOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF INC: $10,000 · ReligionLOUDOUN HUNGER RELI…JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $5,000 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL …FRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS: $2,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF HO…PROJECT KNAPSACK INC: $3,000 · InternationalCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 · Science & Tech
Other$20,000Arts & Culture$15,000Religion$10,000Animals$7,000International$3,000Environment$2,000Science & Tech$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOMELESS ANIMALS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allison Baske Wiese Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allison Baske Wiese Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allison Baske Wiese Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Allison Baske Wiese Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allison Baske Wiese Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph