Skip to content

· Public charity

Alliance for Potato Research and Education

The alliance for potato research & education (apre) is dedicated to advancing the scientific understanding of the role potatoes play in promoting the health of all people.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$803k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$2.0MHealth$1.1MEducation$422kFood & Nutrition$352k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $349k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.1M
$510,260
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$802,919
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$795,000
PENNYSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$510,260
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$199,628
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$149,784
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $175k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA MISSOULA: $200k → 9%Pennsylvania State University: $180k → 16%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUB: $155k → 14%SANSUM DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $175k → 14%Texas A&M University: $70k → 22%University of Arkansas: $170k → 14%Florida State University: $175k → 19%Nutrition Impact LLC: $98k → 14%Brigham Young University: $53k → 8%UGA Research Foundation: $141k → 27%Indiana University: $175k → 18%The Ohio State University: $185k → 15%Nutriscore LLC: $120k → 9%Midwest Biomedical Research: $185k → 7%Global Dairy Platform Inc: $33k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $150k → 19%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $803k → 21%PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENT: $260k → 19%Tufts University: $64k → 16%University of Montana: $130k → 9%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $795k → 16%NUTRITION IMPACT LLC: $58k → 14%Indiana University: $154k → 18%University of Illinois: $90k → 19%Pennington Biomedical Research Center: $190k → 19%Boston University: $140k → 16%PENNYSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $510k → 16%Nutrition Impact LLC: $43k → 14%Boston University: $132k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
MI
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
AR
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 9 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$3.7M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+28%

Still filing today

22%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M
  • LS
    LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2023 · $450k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA
    2× · 2018–2023 · $330k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue +68%
  • MB
    Midwest Biomedical Research
    one grant, 2018 · $185k
  • TO
    THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $185k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
4
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
5
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University of Calgary is a global intellectual hub located in Canada's most enterprising city. In this spirited, high quality learning environment students will thrive in programs made rich by research, hands-on experiences and…

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
9
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida State University Research Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Dairy Platform Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,485,260 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $802,919 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $450,000 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $330,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAIndiana University School of Medicine: $329,000 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $272,244 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $240,184 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $199,628 · OtherNutrition Impact LLC: $198,500 · OtherMidwest Biomedical Research: $185,250 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $185,000 · Other+6 more: $614,686 · Other+6 moreBrigham Young University Alumni LLC: $228,190 · EducationBrigham Young U…UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $199,904 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF N…FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · EducationFLORIDA STATE U…LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $155,000 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIV…University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $141,000 · EducationUniversity of G…Sansum Diabetes Research Institute: $175,000 · HealthGlobal Dairy Platform Inc: $33,000 · Community Improvement
Other$5,292,671Education$899,094Health$175,000Community Improvement$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $272,244 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrigham Young University Alumni LLC: $228,190 over 2y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $199,904 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $175,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $155,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $141,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Dairy Platform Inc: $33,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Brigham Young University Alumni LLC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sansum Diabetes Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Global Dairy Platform Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Association IncTX15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alliance for Potato Research and Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alliance for Potato Research and Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alliance for Potato Research and Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph