Skip to content

Michigan · Public charity

Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care

The corporation is organized to establish a collective response that addresses homelessness and affordable housing in our community.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$123,784
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,235,898
Organizations funded a year
6 to 7
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$356k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsCrime & Legal
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$2.2M40%
FY20236$5.3M0%
FY20226$69M17%
FY20217$39M0%
FY20207$627k0%
FY20196$509k17%
FY20186$487k0%
FY20176$419kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$75MHuman Services$42MCivil Rights$75kCrime & Legal$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Community Housing Network Inc$73,807,459875%
Lighthouse of Oakland County$26,023,04883%
Oakland Livingston Human Service Agency$15,468,617626%
Hope Hospitality and Warming Center Inc$894,407820%
South Oakland Shelter$253,09862%
Common Ground$244,96270%
Street Democracy$74,751329%
Girls Matter$20,00014%
South Oakland Citizens for the Homeless$12,22713%
Haven Inc$8,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 10 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Housing Network Inc: $73,807,459 over 8y, 75% of budgetLighthouse of Oakland County: $26,023,048 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetOakland Livingston Human Service Agency: $15,468,617 over 6y, 26% of budgetHope Hospitality and Warming Center Inc: $894,407 over 8y, 20% of budgetSouth Oakland Shelter: $253,098 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCommon Ground: $244,962 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetStreet Democracy: $74,751 over 3y, 29% of budgetGirls Matter: $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSouth Oakland Citizens for the Homeless: $12,227 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetHaven Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Young Foundation · The Carls Foundation · The Jewish Fund · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · DTE Energy Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care with peer funders

About Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care

How much does Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care give?
Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care reported 5 grants totaling $2,176,173 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (64%), Human Services (36%), Civil Rights (0%).
Who are Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Community Housing Network Inc ($74M), Lighthouse of Oakland County ($26M), Oakland Livingston Human Service Agency ($15M).
Does Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Way for Southeastern Michigan, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan, The Young Foundation.
Where is Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care based?
Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph