Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allen Christian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$104kHuman Services$8kHealth$7kInternational$5kHousing & Shelter$4kRecreation & Sports$4kFood & Nutrition$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,955
Median grant
4
States reached
$506k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$5,014
ABIDING WORD CHURCH$3,640
LAKE POINT CHURCH$3,639
UPPER VALLEY VINEYARD$3,500
NEW LIFE$2,955
SOUTHERN OAKS CHURCH$2,404
MARY IMMACULATE CHURCH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,290
GIVE NEW LIFE FAMILY CHURCH$1,000
LA PROMISA FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Streets Ministries: $100 → 17%Calvary Rescue Missions: $500 → 17%Calvary Rescue Missions: $400 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 32 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
39

Total granted

$112k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-16%

Still filing today

19%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LA PROMESA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +18%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • IF
    INVOLVED FOR LIFE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • AC
    A CHRISTIAN MINISTRY OF NATL PARKS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • MH
    MILE HIGH VINEYARD CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
2
Christian Cooperative Ministry Inc

To provide food and clothing for the residents in madison, tennessee and surrounding davidson county residents that are in need. we also provide sack lunches to the homeless in the area.

—
3
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Manna of Life Ministries

Manna of life ministries, inc. is a non-for-profit faith based program dedicated to serving the homeless and destitute. our goal is to address their immediate hunger needs and ultimately, to emplower them to reverse their current situation.

Food & Nutrition
6
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
7
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
8
Bread of Life Mission

Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.

Human Services
9
Metro Relief

Metro relief seeks to mobilize, empower, restore, and satisfy the needs of the oppressed. it draws people toward christ as the ultimate provider of their needs, and guides them in transforming their own loves as well as thoise people…

Food & Nutrition
10
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
11
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
12
But God Ministries

Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-South Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is La Promesa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKE POINTE BAPTIST CHURCH: $11,244 · OtherLAKE POINTE BAPTIST CHURCHVARIOUS: $10,510 · OtherVARIOUSABIDING WORD CHURCH INC: $9,954 · OtherABIDING WORD CHURCH INCFIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $8,440 · OtherFIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCHMary Immaculate Catholic Church: $6,850 · OtherNEW LIFE: $6,435 · OtherPRESTONWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $5,434 · Other+59 more: $81,461 · Other+59 moreLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · ReligionRECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $250 · ReligionCompassion International Incorporated: $4,817 · InternationalINVOLVED FOR LIFE INC: $2,500 · HealthCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $2,080 · HealthMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $2,450 · Housing & ShelterMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $1,250 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $583 · Food & NutritionThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,300 · EducationCALVARY RESCUE MISSION: $900 · Human ServicesSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$140,328Religion$5,250International$4,817Health$4,580Housing & Shelter$2,450Food & Nutrition$1,833Education$1,300Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINVOLVED FOR LIFE INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $2,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $2,080 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $1,745 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY RESCUE MISSION: $900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $583 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds INVOLVED FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS UNION MISSON ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Christian Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Dallas Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen Christian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen Christian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allen Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph