Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Chino Hills Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $44k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
11
’18
6
’19
4
’20
5
’21
2
’22
1
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$783kEducation$163kPhilanthropy$149kRecreation & Sports$82kReligion$30kHuman Services$27kYouth Development$19kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONTARIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$10,000
PIPELINE BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
CHINO POLICE OFFICER FOUNDATION$5,000
CHINO VALLEY FIRE FOUNDATION$5,000
CHINO VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
ISAIAHS ROCK$5,000
NEW BEGINNINGS MINISTRY$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $761k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOY'S REPUBLIC: $5k → 14%BOY'S REPUBLIC: $4k → 14%BOY'S REPUBLIC: $1k → 14%CARING FOR THE HILLS: $100 → 14%INLAND CHRISTIAN HOME: $22k → 14%INLAND CHRISTIAN HOME: $5k → 14%CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $577k → 14%CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $129k → 14%CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$998k · 20 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$998k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+114%

Still filing today

60%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $721k · revenue +122% · 32% of their budget
  • IC
    INLAND CHRISTIAN HOME INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +57%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE STANFORD DAILY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $21k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • HS
    HARTFORD SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • CV
    CHINO VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT FAMILY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chino Kiwanis Foundation

Encourage ideals of service

—
2
Chino Change Has Inspired New Opportunities

Community involvement

Youth Development
3
Chino High School Sports Booster Club

Support the athletic programs at chino high school

—
4
The Chamber of the Chino Valley

Business membership promotion and economic development for businesses in the cities of chino and chino hills through various community events

—
5
Chico High School Foundation

To provide financial support for the enhancement of the academic, co curricular and extra curricular learning opportunities for students at chico high school.

Education
6
California Chins

California Chins's mission is to accept, care for, and adopt out chinchillas while educating the public about the joys of keeping chinchillas as pets.

—
7
Chino Youth Museum

Provide young people in the community an opportunity to learn about science and history in the chino valley and the world around us, with hands on experience during the year.

Arts & Culture
8
Chino Valley Education Foundation

The Chino Valley Education Foundation was created to serve the Chino Valley Unified School District's community by supporting students, teachers & families. We run programs including the Hungry Kids Project, Homeless Assistance, food…

Education
9
The Rotary Club of Chico Foundation

To provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world.

Community Improvement
10
Chicano Research Center
Education
11
Chico History Museum Inc

To operate the chico history museum in chico, ca and in the process conserve, research and display the history of chico by communicating the history for the education and enjoyment of the community and preserve the relationship of the…

Arts & Culture
12
The University Foundation California State University Chico

To build a culture of philanthropy by harnessing the expertise and passion of our alumni, parents, and friends to raise private support for the education, practical research, and public service that transforms the lives of our students,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chino Hills Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $721,442 · Human ServicesCHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATIONINLAND CHRISTIAN HOME INC: $27,000 · Human Services+3 more: $12,100 · Human ServicesCHINO FAMILY YMCA: $82,000 · OtherCHINO FAMILY YMCAHARTFORD SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $40,000 · OtherHARTFORD SCHOOL OF MUSICFRIENDS OF THE STANFORD DAILY FOUNDATION: $21,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE STANFORD …CHINO VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT FAMILY: $20,000 · OtherCHINO VALLEY SCHOOL DIST…CHINO VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherCHINO VALLEY HISTORICAL …ISAIAHS ROCK: $16,500 · OtherISAIAHS ROCKFIRST AMENDMENT COALITION: $15,000 · OtherCHINO ROTARY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherPIPELINE BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $37,125 · Other+17 moreTHE CHINO HILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $149,492 · PhilanthropyTHE CHINO HI…UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $50,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · EducationONTARIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,575 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCHINO COMMUNITY CHILDRENS THEATRE: $12,500 · Community ImprovementCHINO VALLEY FIRE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCHINO POLICE OFFICERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$760,542Other$285,625Philanthropy$149,492Education$93,575Community Improvement$12,500Public Safety & Disaster$6,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $721,442 over 4y, 32% of budgetTHE CHINO HILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $149,492 over 2y, 40% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND CHRISTIAN HOME INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE STANFORD DAILY FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetONTARIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,575 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST AMENDMENT COALITION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCHINO COMMUNITY CHILDRENS THEATRE: $12,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBoys Republic: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHINO VALLEY FIRE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCHINO POLICE OFFICERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $3,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINO FAIR ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRESS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINO CULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHINO HILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds INLAND CHRISTIAN HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE STANFORD DAILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONTARIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CHINO COMMUNITY CHILDRENS THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds Boys Republic ↗
  • Who funds CHINO VALLEY FIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINO POLICE OFFICERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINO COMMUNITY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds CHINO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHINO FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PRESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR THE HILLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Howard and Nikki Applebaum Foundation TrustCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Howard and Nikki Applebaum Foundation Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allen and Gretchen McCombs Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph